Power struggles and organizational learning in crisis: the impact of power games on healthcare management during COVID-19

Purpose This study aims to explore the impact of power games and leadership dynamics on organizational learning and resilience within healthcare organizations during the COVID-19 pandemic. By examining power struggles and sensegiving practices across hierarchical levels in two Swedish hospitals, the study investigates how these dynamics affected decision-making, crisis management and adaptive responses in a high-pressure environment. Design/methodology/approach This qualitative study uses semi-structured interviews with key healthcare managers and personnel responsible for crisis management. A deductive analysis is applied using theoretical frameworks on organizational learning, power games and sensegiving. Three critical events are analyzed to illustrate the effects of power dynamics and leadership practices on learning and organizational adaptation. Findings The study finds that power games and unilateral sensegiving significantly disrupted communication, decision-making and organizational learning. Informal leadership structures emerged to address immediate challenges, yet tensions with formal management highlighted the need to integrate these emergent practices into formal structures. Practical implications This study highlights that effective pandemic crisis management in healthcare requires balancing formal authority with inclusive and adaptive practices. Key implications include grounding sensegiving in frontline input, adopting flexible “plan-to-plan” approaches, involving hospital-level managers in decision-making, prioritizing practical over political solutions and fostering service-oriented leadership that enables rather than controls. Originality/value This study contributes to understanding how leadership and power dynamics shape learning and resilience during healthcare crises. By combining the insights with organizational learning and the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle, it provides a novel perspective on integrating formal and informal leadership to enhance crisis management.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health Organization and Management
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jhom-08-2025-0495
Primary Topic
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Power struggles and organizational learning in crisis: the impact of power games on healthcare management during COVID-19

Journal of Health Organization and Management
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
article

Power struggles and organizational learning in crisis: the impact of power games on healthcare management during COVID-19

article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to explore the impact of power games and leadership dynamics on organizational learning and resilience within healthcare organizations during the COVID-19 pandemic. By examining power struggles and sensegiving practices across hierarchical levels in two Swedish hospitals, the study investigates how these dynamics affected decision-making, crisis management and adaptive responses in a high-pressure environment. Design/methodology/approach This qualitative study uses semi-structured interviews with key healthcare managers and personnel responsible for crisis management. A deductive analysis is applied using theoretical frameworks on organizational learning, power games and sensegiving. Three critical events are analyzed to illustrate the effects of power dynamics and leadership practices on learning and organizational adaptation. Findings The study finds that power games and unilateral sensegiving significantly disrupted communication, decision-making and organizational learning. Informal leadership structures emerged to address immediate challenges, yet tensions with formal management highlighted the need to integrate these emergent practices into formal structures. Practical implications This study highlights that effective pandemic crisis management in healthcare requires balancing formal authority with inclusive and adaptive practices. Key implications include grounding sensegiving in frontline input, adopting flexible “plan-to-plan” approaches, involving hospital-level managers in decision-making, prioritizing practical over political solutions and fostering service-oriented leadership that enables rather than controls. Originality/value This study contributes to understanding how leadership and power dynamics shape learning and resilience during healthcare crises. By combining the insights with organizational learning and the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle, it provides a novel perspective on integrating formal and informal leadership to enhance crisis management.

Journal of Health Organization and ManagementVol. 39(9)
Hebei University of Economics and Business (CN), University of the West (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Power struggles and organizational learning in crisis: the impact of power games on healthcare management during COVID-19 · Journal of Health Organization and Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS