Relationships Among Personal, Institutional, Engagement, and Outcome Factors: Comparison of American College Seniors With and Without Reported Disabilities

Extant literature reveals that students with reported disabilities perform relatively lower than those without reported disabilities in several higher education outcome metrics. While there is research pointing to performance challenges among students with reported disabilities during higher education and after, there are limited studies examining relationships among personal, institutional, engagement, and outcome factors in a predictive-mediating-moderating model to derive information about what can improve performance and foster parity. This quantitative study used generalized structural equation modeling and analyzed the entire population of American four-year college seniors with reported disabilities and an equally matched random sample of 20% students without reported disabilities who participated in the National Survey of Student Engagement administered in 2022. The analysis of predictive relationships among personal, institutional, engagement, and outcome variables revealed group differences in the prediction of the highest expected education by student-faculty interaction. Although institutional variables were statistically significant predictors of student engagement and outcome factors, they were stronger predictors of engagement. The indirect effects of institutional variables in the mediating models did not improve the prediction of student outcomes compared to the direct prediction by personal factors. The findings have implications for higher education policies, programs, and research.

Publication Details

Journal
Seton Hall University eRepository (Seton Hall University)
Published
2025-09-22
Primary Topic
Disability Education and Employment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relationships Among Personal, Institutional, Engagement, and Outcome Factors: Comparison of American College Seniors With and Without Reported Disabilities

Seton Hall University eRepository (Seton Hall University)
Disability Education and Employment
article

Relationships Among Personal, Institutional, Engagement, and Outcome Factors: Comparison of American College Seniors With and Without Reported Disabilities

article en

Abstract

Extant literature reveals that students with reported disabilities perform relatively lower than those without reported disabilities in several higher education outcome metrics. While there is research pointing to performance challenges among students with reported disabilities during higher education and after, there are limited studies examining relationships among personal, institutional, engagement, and outcome factors in a predictive-mediating-moderating model to derive information about what can improve performance and foster parity. This quantitative study used generalized structural equation modeling and analyzed the entire population of American four-year college seniors with reported disabilities and an equally matched random sample of 20% students without reported disabilities who participated in the National Survey of Student Engagement administered in 2022. The analysis of predictive relationships among personal, institutional, engagement, and outcome variables revealed group differences in the prediction of the highest expected education by student-faculty interaction. Although institutional variables were statistically significant predictors of student engagement and outcome factors, they were stronger predictors of engagement. The indirect effects of institutional variables in the mediating models did not improve the prediction of student outcomes compared to the direct prediction by personal factors. The findings have implications for higher education policies, programs, and research.

Seton Hall University eRepository (Seton Hall University)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Disability Education and Employment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.