Comparative Study of Non-Iterative Seqential Method for Biot's Poroelasticity Model

Linear poroelasticity theory describes the interaction between the motion of fluids and deformation of porous media. The theory serves various applications in a wide range of science and engineering fields, such as soil mechanics, oil reservoir modeling, and bio-medical applications. Partial differential equations are used to model the complex interaction between fluid flow and solid deformation in porous media. Since analytical solutions to these equations are rarely available for realistic problems, we resort to numerical solutions. One major advantage is their ability to provide accurate approximations of the solutions. Various numerical methods have been proposed to solve Biot's poroelasticity system. These methods are mainly classified into three main classes: monolithic methods, sequential methods, and iterative methods. The sequential methods decouple the system into flow and mechanics subproblems, then solve them sequentially one after the other at each time step. In this thesis we propose two sequential finite element methods to solve Biot's poroelasticity system. The methods both use stabilization terms to ensure convergence and stability of the displacement and pressure solutions, and differ mainly by the type of stabilization used. Particularly, the first uses a L2 -type stabilization term while the second uses an H 1 -type stabilization term. An extensive numerical convergence study of both sequential methods was conducted. First, we used two manufactured solutions with pure Dirichlet boundary conditions. The performance of both sequential methods is analyzed for two different parameter regimes. The H1 -type stabilization method proves more robust and delivers better and optimal convergence rates for both parameter regimes. Another numerical convergence study for the sequential method with H 1 -type stabilizing approach is carried out with another manufactured solution and mixed boundary conditions, where the approach offers optimal convergence rates. The performance of this method was also tested against the well-known Barry and Mercer problem.

Publication Details

Journal
scholarworks - UTEP (The University of Texas at El Paso)
Published
2025-05-01
Primary Topic
Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study of Non-Iterative Seqential Method for Biot's Poroelasticity Model

scholarworks - UTEP (The University of Texas at El Paso)
Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
article

Comparative Study of Non-Iterative Seqential Method for Biot's Poroelasticity Model

article en

Abstract

Linear poroelasticity theory describes the interaction between the motion of fluids and deformation of porous media. The theory serves various applications in a wide range of science and engineering fields, such as soil mechanics, oil reservoir modeling, and bio-medical applications. Partial differential equations are used to model the complex interaction between fluid flow and solid deformation in porous media. Since analytical solutions to these equations are rarely available for realistic problems, we resort to numerical solutions. One major advantage is their ability to provide accurate approximations of the solutions. Various numerical methods have been proposed to solve Biot's poroelasticity system. These methods are mainly classified into three main classes: monolithic methods, sequential methods, and iterative methods. The sequential methods decouple the system into flow and mechanics subproblems, then solve them sequentially one after the other at each time step. In this thesis we propose two sequential finite element methods to solve Biot's poroelasticity system. The methods both use stabilization terms to ensure convergence and stability of the displacement and pressure solutions, and differ mainly by the type of stabilization used. Particularly, the first uses a L2 -type stabilization term while the second uses an H 1 -type stabilization term. An extensive numerical convergence study of both sequential methods was conducted. First, we used two manufactured solutions with pure Dirichlet boundary conditions. The performance of both sequential methods is analyzed for two different parameter regimes. The H1 -type stabilization method proves more robust and delivers better and optimal convergence rates for both parameter regimes. Another numerical convergence study for the sequential method with H 1 -type stabilizing approach is carried out with another manufactured solution and mixed boundary conditions, where the approach offers optimal convergence rates. The performance of this method was also tested against the well-known Barry and Mercer problem.

scholarworks - UTEP (The University of Texas at El Paso)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Study of Non-Iterative Seqential Method for Biot's Poroelasticity Model · scholarworks - UTEP (The University of Texas at El Paso) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS