From truce to tragedy: The duration effect of ceasefires on renewed conflict deadliness

This study investigates the effect of ceasefire duration on the deadliness of recurring conflicts. While ceasefires are typically seen as a step toward peace, this research explores a counterintuitive dynamic: longer ceasefires may contribute to more deadly conflict episodes when war resumes. Drawing on theories of bargaining, the study hypothesizes that protracted ceasefire periods enable warring parties to bolster their military capacities, recruit combatants, and increase combat readiness. Utilizing a cross-national dataset of civil wars and applying regression analysis, the study tests whether longer ceasefires are statistically associated with higher battle-related deaths in subsequent conflict episodes. The findings aim to contribute to the literature on conflict recurrence by highlighting how the duration and other characteristics of ceasefires influence war dynamics, offering implications for international mediators and peacebuilders seeking sustainable resolutions to civil wars.

Publication Details

Journal
SHAREOK (University of Oklahoma; Oklahoma State University; Central Oklahoma University)
Published
2025-05-01
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From truce to tragedy: The duration effect of ceasefires on renewed conflict deadliness

SHAREOK (University of Oklahoma; Oklahoma State University; Central Oklahoma University)
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

From truce to tragedy: The duration effect of ceasefires on renewed conflict deadliness

article en

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of ceasefire duration on the deadliness of recurring conflicts. While ceasefires are typically seen as a step toward peace, this research explores a counterintuitive dynamic: longer ceasefires may contribute to more deadly conflict episodes when war resumes. Drawing on theories of bargaining, the study hypothesizes that protracted ceasefire periods enable warring parties to bolster their military capacities, recruit combatants, and increase combat readiness. Utilizing a cross-national dataset of civil wars and applying regression analysis, the study tests whether longer ceasefires are statistically associated with higher battle-related deaths in subsequent conflict episodes. The findings aim to contribute to the literature on conflict recurrence by highlighting how the duration and other characteristics of ceasefires influence war dynamics, offering implications for international mediators and peacebuilders seeking sustainable resolutions to civil wars.

SHAREOK (University of Oklahoma; Oklahoma State University; Central Oklahoma University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.