AB’nin “Jeopolitik Uyanışı” İçinde Aktörlüğü Nasıl Açıklanabilir ? İsrail-Filistin Çatışması ve Avrupa Birliği’nin Etkinliği ve Uyumu

Since mid-2010s, two concomitant processes have been going on in terms of the EU’s perspective on its foreign policy: The EU’s relatively proactive inclusion into some particular conflicts (and its deliberate self-exclusion in some others) on one hand and the rise of the geopolitical tone of the EU foreign policy and neighbourhood policy on the other. This recent “geopolitical turn” challenged the Union’s predominant position in crisis situations as well as its broader self-representation about its own foreign policy actorness. On top of this, there has been many question marks about the EU’s actorness in terms of its involvement in protracted conflicts. Despite good intentions and progressively improved capabilities, it is intriguing why the EU had been selective in the management of some territorial conflicts in its neighbourhood. The main argument of the paper is that current mainstream theoretical approaches of the European foreign policy, such as “normative power Europe”, are overly optimistic and do not allow to put in focus certain dynamics the understanding of which are crucial to understanding the shortcomings of the EU’s actorness in terms of the Israeli-Palestine conflict, where the actorness is captured throughout the paper in terms of the EU’s effectiveness and coherence.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
OpenMETU (Middle East Technical University)
Published
2024-12-01
Primary Topic
Belt and Road Initiative
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AB’nin “Jeopolitik Uyanışı” İçinde Aktörlüğü Nasıl Açıklanabilir ? İsrail-Filistin Çatışması ve Avrupa Birliği’nin Etkinliği ve Uyumu

OpenMETU (Middle East Technical University)
Belt and Road Initiative
article

AB’nin “Jeopolitik Uyanışı” İçinde Aktörlüğü Nasıl Açıklanabilir ? İsrail-Filistin Çatışması ve Avrupa Birliği’nin Etkinliği ve Uyumu

article en

Abstract

Since mid-2010s, two concomitant processes have been going on in terms of the EU’s perspective on its foreign policy: The EU’s relatively proactive inclusion into some particular conflicts (and its deliberate self-exclusion in some others) on one hand and the rise of the geopolitical tone of the EU foreign policy and neighbourhood policy on the other. This recent “geopolitical turn” challenged the Union’s predominant position in crisis situations as well as its broader self-representation about its own foreign policy actorness. On top of this, there has been many question marks about the EU’s actorness in terms of its involvement in protracted conflicts. Despite good intentions and progressively improved capabilities, it is intriguing why the EU had been selective in the management of some territorial conflicts in its neighbourhood. The main argument of the paper is that current mainstream theoretical approaches of the European foreign policy, such as “normative power Europe”, are overly optimistic and do not allow to put in focus certain dynamics the understanding of which are crucial to understanding the shortcomings of the EU’s actorness in terms of the Israeli-Palestine conflict, where the actorness is captured throughout the paper in terms of the EU’s effectiveness and coherence.

OpenMETU (Middle East Technical University)
Middle East Technical University (TR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Belt and Road Initiative
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.