With Kant, Beyond Kant: The Organisational Approach to Naturalised Biological Teleology

This paper critically examines the organisational approach (OA) to biological teleology in relation and opposition to Immanuel Kant’s notion of natural purpose. Whereas for Kant biological purposiveness leads to an antinomy of mechanism and teleology, the OA succeeds in naturalising biological purpose through the notion of biological organisation as self maintaining and self-determining. In particular, I argue that the OA naturalisation strategy hinges on two theoretical moves: (1) adopting a pluralistic understanding of causality which conciliates mechanism and teleology in one causal network (through the notion of closure of constraints and Robert Rosen’s anti-Newtonian stance); (2) reinterpreting Kant’s own notion of natural purpose, by, contra Kant, centring self-organisation (‘epigenesis’) over organisation (‘design’). This work not only positions the OA in the contemporary ‘post-Kantian’ theoretical debates about biological teleology as a unique naturalising position but also identifies theoretical organisational bases for further studies regarding the role of biological self determination in evolution.

Publication Details

Journal
PhilSci-Archive (University of Pittsburgh)
Published
2025-04-25
Primary Topic
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

With Kant, Beyond Kant: The Organisational Approach to Naturalised Biological Teleology

PhilSci-Archive (University of Pittsburgh)
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
article

With Kant, Beyond Kant: The Organisational Approach to Naturalised Biological Teleology

article en

Abstract

This paper critically examines the organisational approach (OA) to biological teleology in relation and opposition to Immanuel Kant’s notion of natural purpose. Whereas for Kant biological purposiveness leads to an antinomy of mechanism and teleology, the OA succeeds in naturalising biological purpose through the notion of biological organisation as self maintaining and self-determining. In particular, I argue that the OA naturalisation strategy hinges on two theoretical moves: (1) adopting a pluralistic understanding of causality which conciliates mechanism and teleology in one causal network (through the notion of closure of constraints and Robert Rosen’s anti-Newtonian stance); (2) reinterpreting Kant’s own notion of natural purpose, by, contra Kant, centring self-organisation (‘epigenesis’) over organisation (‘design’). This work not only positions the OA in the contemporary ‘post-Kantian’ theoretical debates about biological teleology as a unique naturalising position but also identifies theoretical organisational bases for further studies regarding the role of biological self determination in evolution.

PhilSci-Archive (University of Pittsburgh)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.