Nonreplicated factorial experiments assessing print quality in additive manufacturing

Additive manufacturing techniques such as fused deposition modeling (FDM) are commonly used within engineering for rapid prototyping of designed parts. The Endeavor Lab at Oklahoma State University (OSU) takes advantage of this technology and provides 3D printing services to engineering students. To determine which variables of the Bambu P1P printing process most significantly affect the final print quality, a 25 factorial experiment was designed. Five different process variables were tested at a low and high level. The experimental design included only one replication to simulate time and budget constraints, which are very common in small-scale engineering experiments. The printed specimens were tested according to ASTM D638-14, and the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) for each specimen was recorded. The data were analyzed according to methods presented by Milliken and Johnson (1989). Because the use of a single experimental replication results in a lack of true experimental error, multiple analysis methods were examined to compare results. Techniques including Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and half-normal plot of effects were employed. For this experiment, traditional ANOVA methods concluded that an interaction between print direction and location on the build platform contributed to a marginally significant (p = 0.1025) effect on UTS for the printed specimens. The alternative half-normal plot approach to the analysis also indicated that the same interaction was marginally significant. Additionally, no obvious drift effects were observed for the printing process. Further experimentation into the effect of print direction and location should be pursued to more confidently conclude the effects of these variables on the UTS of the printed specimens.

Publication Details

Journal
SHAREOK (University of Oklahoma; Oklahoma State University; Central Oklahoma University)
Published
2025-05-01
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nonreplicated factorial experiments assessing print quality in additive manufacturing

SHAREOK (University of Oklahoma; Oklahoma State University; Central Oklahoma University)
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
article

Nonreplicated factorial experiments assessing print quality in additive manufacturing

article en

Abstract

Additive manufacturing techniques such as fused deposition modeling (FDM) are commonly used within engineering for rapid prototyping of designed parts. The Endeavor Lab at Oklahoma State University (OSU) takes advantage of this technology and provides 3D printing services to engineering students. To determine which variables of the Bambu P1P printing process most significantly affect the final print quality, a 25 factorial experiment was designed. Five different process variables were tested at a low and high level. The experimental design included only one replication to simulate time and budget constraints, which are very common in small-scale engineering experiments. The printed specimens were tested according to ASTM D638-14, and the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) for each specimen was recorded. The data were analyzed according to methods presented by Milliken and Johnson (1989). Because the use of a single experimental replication results in a lack of true experimental error, multiple analysis methods were examined to compare results. Techniques including Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and half-normal plot of effects were employed. For this experiment, traditional ANOVA methods concluded that an interaction between print direction and location on the build platform contributed to a marginally significant (p = 0.1025) effect on UTS for the printed specimens. The alternative half-normal plot approach to the analysis also indicated that the same interaction was marginally significant. Additionally, no obvious drift effects were observed for the printing process. Further experimentation into the effect of print direction and location should be pursued to more confidently conclude the effects of these variables on the UTS of the printed specimens.

SHAREOK (University of Oklahoma; Oklahoma State University; Central Oklahoma University)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.