Deaf interaction with law enforcement: A survey approach

There are several news sources and stories that report negative interactions between law enforcement officers and individuals with hearing loss due to drastic measures taken by the law enforcement officers. Along with these negative reports, minimal research has been done on how interactions between law enforcement officers and individuals with hearing loss typically occur without media reports. This study investigated factors that influence positive and negative interactions with law enforcement along with how interactions with law enforcement officers can be improved. This study specifically looked at survey responses from those in the d/Deaf community through open-ended and scale questions. Surveys of 49 adults from around the U.S. were analyzed. Results of this study showed that a slight majority of interactions with law enforcement officers were positive and impacted by officer actions and presentation and participant actions. However, many interactions were negative, and survey respondents reported several ideas to help improve these interactions overall, including more training on accommodations for officers. To assist in implementing these suggestions into practice, speech-language pathologists, audiologists, other allies, and d/Deaf individuals should advocate and educate those in law enforcement agencies in order to create safe and positive interactions.

Publication Details

Journal
SHAREOK (University of Oklahoma; Oklahoma State University; Central Oklahoma University)
Published
2025-05-01
Primary Topic
Hearing Impairment and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deaf interaction with law enforcement: A survey approach

SHAREOK (University of Oklahoma; Oklahoma State University; Central Oklahoma University)
Hearing Impairment and Communication
article

Deaf interaction with law enforcement: A survey approach

article en

Abstract

There are several news sources and stories that report negative interactions between law enforcement officers and individuals with hearing loss due to drastic measures taken by the law enforcement officers. Along with these negative reports, minimal research has been done on how interactions between law enforcement officers and individuals with hearing loss typically occur without media reports. This study investigated factors that influence positive and negative interactions with law enforcement along with how interactions with law enforcement officers can be improved. This study specifically looked at survey responses from those in the d/Deaf community through open-ended and scale questions. Surveys of 49 adults from around the U.S. were analyzed. Results of this study showed that a slight majority of interactions with law enforcement officers were positive and impacted by officer actions and presentation and participant actions. However, many interactions were negative, and survey respondents reported several ideas to help improve these interactions overall, including more training on accommodations for officers. To assist in implementing these suggestions into practice, speech-language pathologists, audiologists, other allies, and d/Deaf individuals should advocate and educate those in law enforcement agencies in order to create safe and positive interactions.

SHAREOK (University of Oklahoma; Oklahoma State University; Central Oklahoma University)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Hearing Impairment and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.