Functional Monitoring of Object Detectors via CCS: A Label - Free Evaluation Metric for Embedded AI

Abstract. Evaluating object detection (OD) models often relies on ground truth annotations, which are unavailable in many real-world scenarios. To address this, we propose the Cumulative Consensus Score (CCS), a metric that enables DevOps-style monitoring and iterative refinement of object detectors without human annotations. CCS leverages TestTime Data Augmentation (TTDA) to estimate spatial uncertainty, allowing comparison between existing and newly developed object detection models. We validate CCS through controlled experiments by comparing its congruence with established ground-truth-based metrics, including F1 score, pairwise Probabilistic Detection Quality (pPDQ), and Optimal Correction Cost (OC-cost). Unlike dataset-level metrics such as mAP, these metrics and CCS help identify underperforming cases for targeted evaluation. Experiments across multiple model architectures demonstrate CCS's robustness and alignment with standard metrics. We also outline future directions for improving CCS.

Publication Details

Journal
elib (German Aerospace Center)
Published
2025-06-15
Primary Topic
Advanced Neural Network Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Functional Monitoring of Object Detectors via CCS: A Label - Free Evaluation Metric for Embedded AI

elib (German Aerospace Center)
Advanced Neural Network Applications
article

Functional Monitoring of Object Detectors via CCS: A Label - Free Evaluation Metric for Embedded AI

article en

Abstract

Abstract. Evaluating object detection (OD) models often relies on ground truth annotations, which are unavailable in many real-world scenarios. To address this, we propose the Cumulative Consensus Score (CCS), a metric that enables DevOps-style monitoring and iterative refinement of object detectors without human annotations. CCS leverages TestTime Data Augmentation (TTDA) to estimate spatial uncertainty, allowing comparison between existing and newly developed object detection models. We validate CCS through controlled experiments by comparing its congruence with established ground-truth-based metrics, including F1 score, pairwise Probabilistic Detection Quality (pPDQ), and Optimal Correction Cost (OC-cost). Unlike dataset-level metrics such as mAP, these metrics and CCS help identify underperforming cases for targeted evaluation. Experiments across multiple model architectures demonstrate CCS's robustness and alignment with standard metrics. We also outline future directions for improving CCS.

elib (German Aerospace Center)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Advanced Neural Network Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.