Survey on diversity, equity, and inclusion practices in communication sciences and disorders programs in the USA

In recent years, the concept of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) has gained widespread recognition in higher education. These concepts have been at the center of institutional policies, faculty development initiatives, and student support programs as universities and colleges strive to create environments where all students feel valued and supported in their academic pursuits. Past literature has highlighted the progress and evolution of DEI, but there is a limited amount of research on the standardized implementation of DEI practices within communication sciences and disorders (CSD) programs, creating inconsistencies in how these principles are taught and applied. Addressing this gap is essential for fostering a more inclusive and representative profession. The objective of the current study was to establish a comprehensive understanding of the current DEI practices within CSD programs across the U.S. as well as identify how these practices are affecting the well-being of students and faculty within the programs. This was achieved through data gathered from current CSD faculty and staff within the U.S. and Puerto Rico. This survey elicited responses about the participants’ demographics as well as their thoughts and feelings on DEI within their academic departments. The findings of this study, discovered through qualitative and quantitative analysis, unearthed several trends by showing how response patterns shift across subgroups as well as found four main themes from open response questions: (1) Equity and Inclusion Considerations, (2) Recruitment, Admissions, and Hiring, (3) Education, Training, and Institutional Development, and (4) Support, Funding, and Community Engagement. Further research is needed to reveal students' thoughts and opinions on DEI practices within their academic departments as well as a need for greater diverse perspectives on this topic. Through the findings of this survey, CSD professionals can find new ways to encourage DEI in their departments and help foster an environment that prioritizes inclusivity and equity for all those involved.

Publication Details

Journal
SHAREOK (University of Oklahoma; Oklahoma State University; Central Oklahoma University)
Published
2025-05-01
Primary Topic
Higher Education Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Survey on diversity, equity, and inclusion practices in communication sciences and disorders programs in the USA

SHAREOK (University of Oklahoma; Oklahoma State University; Central Oklahoma University)
Higher Education Research Studies
article

Survey on diversity, equity, and inclusion practices in communication sciences and disorders programs in the USA

article en

Abstract

In recent years, the concept of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) has gained widespread recognition in higher education. These concepts have been at the center of institutional policies, faculty development initiatives, and student support programs as universities and colleges strive to create environments where all students feel valued and supported in their academic pursuits. Past literature has highlighted the progress and evolution of DEI, but there is a limited amount of research on the standardized implementation of DEI practices within communication sciences and disorders (CSD) programs, creating inconsistencies in how these principles are taught and applied. Addressing this gap is essential for fostering a more inclusive and representative profession. The objective of the current study was to establish a comprehensive understanding of the current DEI practices within CSD programs across the U.S. as well as identify how these practices are affecting the well-being of students and faculty within the programs. This was achieved through data gathered from current CSD faculty and staff within the U.S. and Puerto Rico. This survey elicited responses about the participants’ demographics as well as their thoughts and feelings on DEI within their academic departments. The findings of this study, discovered through qualitative and quantitative analysis, unearthed several trends by showing how response patterns shift across subgroups as well as found four main themes from open response questions: (1) Equity and Inclusion Considerations, (2) Recruitment, Admissions, and Hiring, (3) Education, Training, and Institutional Development, and (4) Support, Funding, and Community Engagement. Further research is needed to reveal students' thoughts and opinions on DEI practices within their academic departments as well as a need for greater diverse perspectives on this topic. Through the findings of this survey, CSD professionals can find new ways to encourage DEI in their departments and help foster an environment that prioritizes inclusivity and equity for all those involved.

SHAREOK (University of Oklahoma; Oklahoma State University; Central Oklahoma University)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Higher Education Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.