Systematic evaluation of ChatGPT performance in providing renewable energy information

With the advent of attention mechanisms and the development of transformer-based architectures, a new era of large language models (LLMs) has emerged. These models have given rise to a wide range of fine-tuned applications capable of providing high-quality and informative responses. ChatGPT, a chatbot developed by OpenAI using a popular LLM called GPT 3.5, has demonstrated its capability to provide valuable information in a range of fields. The renewable energy field is a prominent field, which aims to explore alternative sources of energy that are more affordable and effective. In this study, we examine how accurate ChatGPT is when it comes to providing general, non-technical information on renewable energy compared to human experts in this field. A set of prompts was presented to ChatGPT as well as to a human expert. Responses have been collected and evaluated using a set of similarity measures. Further to this, a pre-trained Google vector has been applied to emphasize semantic similarity, and then a more sophisticated LLM competitor evaluation, Gemini, has been employed to evaluate the degree of similarity between ChatGPT responses and those of human experts. It surprisingly comes to a point where ChatGPT responses were more accurate and relevant than those of human experts’ responses on renewable energy prompts. This study concludes that ChatGPT is a promising and supportive resource for renewable-energy information, offering responses remarkably close to those of a human expert.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PeerJ Computer Science
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.3295
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic evaluation of ChatGPT performance in providing renewable energy information

PeerJ Computer Science
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Systematic evaluation of ChatGPT performance in providing renewable energy information

article en

Abstract

With the advent of attention mechanisms and the development of transformer-based architectures, a new era of large language models (LLMs) has emerged. These models have given rise to a wide range of fine-tuned applications capable of providing high-quality and informative responses. ChatGPT, a chatbot developed by OpenAI using a popular LLM called GPT 3.5, has demonstrated its capability to provide valuable information in a range of fields. The renewable energy field is a prominent field, which aims to explore alternative sources of energy that are more affordable and effective. In this study, we examine how accurate ChatGPT is when it comes to providing general, non-technical information on renewable energy compared to human experts in this field. A set of prompts was presented to ChatGPT as well as to a human expert. Responses have been collected and evaluated using a set of similarity measures. Further to this, a pre-trained Google vector has been applied to emphasize semantic similarity, and then a more sophisticated LLM competitor evaluation, Gemini, has been employed to evaluate the degree of similarity between ChatGPT responses and those of human experts. It surprisingly comes to a point where ChatGPT responses were more accurate and relevant than those of human experts’ responses on renewable energy prompts. This study concludes that ChatGPT is a promising and supportive resource for renewable-energy information, offering responses remarkably close to those of a human expert.

PeerJ Computer ScienceVol. 11
University of Anbar (IQ), University of Lincoln (GB), Liverpool John Moores University (GB), National University of Malaysia (MY)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.