The Impact of Different Grid Size Values and Dose Calculation Algorithms on Plan Accuracy in Vmat-Based Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer

This study evaluated the impact of dose calculation algorithms (Monte Carlo and Pencil Beam) and grid size values (1.5 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm) on the accuracy of VMAT-based radiotherapy plans for breast cancer. Six different treatment plans were generated for each patient using combinations of algorithm and grid size values. The plan created with the Monte Carlo algorithm and a 1.5 mm grid size was designated as the reference plan, and all other plans were compared dosimetrically to this baseline. Results showed that both the choice of algorithm and grid size significantly influenced dose distribution in target volumes (PTVs) and organs at risk (OARs). For example, the D%98 value of the PTVmeme in the reference plan was 47.2 ± 1.0 Gy, which decreased to 44.4 ± 1.4 Gy in the Pencil Beam plan with a 5 mm grid size. For OARs, algorithm selection had a more pronounced impact. The V20 of the ipsilateral lung was 24.2 ± 0.9% in the reference plan but dropped to 20.3 ± 1.2% in the Pencil Beam plan with a 1.5 mm grid size (p

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32708/uutfd.1762554
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Different Grid Size Values and Dose Calculation Algorithms on Plan Accuracy in Vmat-Based Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer

Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

The Impact of Different Grid Size Values and Dose Calculation Algorithms on Plan Accuracy in Vmat-Based Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer

article en

Abstract

This study evaluated the impact of dose calculation algorithms (Monte Carlo and Pencil Beam) and grid size values (1.5 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm) on the accuracy of VMAT-based radiotherapy plans for breast cancer. Six different treatment plans were generated for each patient using combinations of algorithm and grid size values. The plan created with the Monte Carlo algorithm and a 1.5 mm grid size was designated as the reference plan, and all other plans were compared dosimetrically to this baseline. Results showed that both the choice of algorithm and grid size significantly influenced dose distribution in target volumes (PTVs) and organs at risk (OARs). For example, the D%98 value of the PTVmeme in the reference plan was 47.2 ± 1.0 Gy, which decreased to 44.4 ± 1.4 Gy in the Pencil Beam plan with a 5 mm grid size. For OARs, algorithm selection had a more pronounced impact. The V20 of the ipsilateral lung was 24.2 ± 0.9% in the reference plan but dropped to 20.3 ± 1.2% in the Pencil Beam plan with a 1.5 mm grid size (p

Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi DergisiVol. 51(3)
Bursa Uludağ Üni̇versi̇tesi̇ (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.