Comparison of noise levels of two magnetometer types and their suitability for different space environments

Abstract. The plasma environment around Earth has markedly different characteristics of the magnetic field across distinct spatial regions. In the solar wind, beyond Earth's magnetic influence, the magnetic field is relatively low and less fluctuating. In contrast, the magnetosheath – the region between the bow shock and the magnetopause – is characterized by significantly more turbulent magnetic fields. Within the magnetosphere, the magnetic field can go up to tens of thousands of nanotesla (nT). Traditionally, fluxgate magnetometers (FGM) have been the standard instrument for space-based magnetic field measurements. However, in recent years, alternative technologies such as anisotropic magnetoresistive (AMR) sensors and optically pumped magnetometers have been proposed and, in some cases, deployed. This study compares the noise performances of two magnetometers, an FGM and an AMR, by evaluating their amplitude spectral density measurements across various near-Earth regions of space. The potential of each sensor type for investigating specific phenomena is also evaluated.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoscientific instrumentation, methods and data systems
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-14-447-2025
Primary Topic
Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of noise levels of two magnetometer types and their suitability for different space environments

Geoscientific instrumentation, methods and data systems
Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques
article

Comparison of noise levels of two magnetometer types and their suitability for different space environments

article en

Abstract

Abstract. The plasma environment around Earth has markedly different characteristics of the magnetic field across distinct spatial regions. In the solar wind, beyond Earth's magnetic influence, the magnetic field is relatively low and less fluctuating. In contrast, the magnetosheath – the region between the bow shock and the magnetopause – is characterized by significantly more turbulent magnetic fields. Within the magnetosphere, the magnetic field can go up to tens of thousands of nanotesla (nT). Traditionally, fluxgate magnetometers (FGM) have been the standard instrument for space-based magnetic field measurements. However, in recent years, alternative technologies such as anisotropic magnetoresistive (AMR) sensors and optically pumped magnetometers have been proposed and, in some cases, deployed. This study compares the noise performances of two magnetometers, an FGM and an AMR, by evaluating their amplitude spectral density measurements across various near-Earth regions of space. The potential of each sensor type for investigating specific phenomena is also evaluated.

Geoscientific instrumentation, methods and data systemsVol. 14(2)
Austrian Academy of Sciences (AT), Space Research Institute (AT), Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Atmospheric Physics (CZ), Technische Universität Braunschweig (DE)
Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Technische Universität Braunschweig
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of noise levels of two magnetometer types and their suitability for different space environments · Geoscientific instrumentation, methods and data systems (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS