Pitfalls in applying intersectional frameworks to social inequality: a systematic review of research on first-generation students

Purpose Research on first-generation students has gained considerable attention in recent years. Yet, much of the existing research fails to account for the diversity within this group. To mitigate the risk of overlooking the interaction between multiple dimensions of inequality, Black feminism has introduced the concept of intersectionality. This article explores the various ways in which intersectionality is applied as a theoretical framework in studies focused on first-generation students. Design/methodology/approach To conduct a comprehensive analysis and identify overarching themes, 43 empirical studies were incorporated into the final corpus through a systematic review. Findings Findings show that (1) the perspectivization is used to reinforce categories rather than to dissolve them; (2) interpretations of intersectionality have mostly led to additive applications where opinions on which intersectional category most affect disadvantage differ and (3) by proposing compensation measures, some of the studies under review conclude that students must adapt to normative standards rather than emphasizing the structurally transformative potential inherent in the intersectional framework. Research limitations/implications The results reveal substantial potential for the advancement of research in this field, including the need for an analysis of temporarily stabilized social meanings against the backdrop of social structures, the reflection of the interrelatedness of social structures, a consideration of the social justice agenda consistent with intersectional research, the multiplication of methods that take intersections into account and an examination of the interests served by these classifications. Originality/value This paper illuminates novel perspectives on intersectional research that offer valuable contributions to broader discussions surrounding equity, diversity and inclusion.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Equality Diversity and Inclusion An International Journal
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/edi-09-2024-0417
Primary Topic
Critical Race Theory in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pitfalls in applying intersectional frameworks to social inequality: a systematic review of research on first-generation students

Equality Diversity and Inclusion An International Journal
Critical Race Theory in Education
article

Pitfalls in applying intersectional frameworks to social inequality: a systematic review of research on first-generation students

article en

Abstract

Purpose Research on first-generation students has gained considerable attention in recent years. Yet, much of the existing research fails to account for the diversity within this group. To mitigate the risk of overlooking the interaction between multiple dimensions of inequality, Black feminism has introduced the concept of intersectionality. This article explores the various ways in which intersectionality is applied as a theoretical framework in studies focused on first-generation students. Design/methodology/approach To conduct a comprehensive analysis and identify overarching themes, 43 empirical studies were incorporated into the final corpus through a systematic review. Findings Findings show that (1) the perspectivization is used to reinforce categories rather than to dissolve them; (2) interpretations of intersectionality have mostly led to additive applications where opinions on which intersectional category most affect disadvantage differ and (3) by proposing compensation measures, some of the studies under review conclude that students must adapt to normative standards rather than emphasizing the structurally transformative potential inherent in the intersectional framework. Research limitations/implications The results reveal substantial potential for the advancement of research in this field, including the need for an analysis of temporarily stabilized social meanings against the backdrop of social structures, the reflection of the interrelatedness of social structures, a consideration of the social justice agenda consistent with intersectional research, the multiplication of methods that take intersections into account and an examination of the interests served by these classifications. Originality/value This paper illuminates novel perspectives on intersectional research that offer valuable contributions to broader discussions surrounding equity, diversity and inclusion.

Equality Diversity and Inclusion An International Journal
Centre for Higher Education (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Critical Race Theory in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pitfalls in applying intersectional frameworks to social inequality: a systematic review of research on first-generation students · Equality Diversity and Inclusion An International Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS