The attractive personality: Like me, but better

People tend to prefer mates who are similar to themselves, yet also desire partners with specific characteristics. The relative importance of assortative and absolute preferences might differ for big five and political personality. We examined partner preferences at the facet level of the big five framework and compared them with preferences regarding a key political personality trait—social dominance orientation (SDO). We also assessed how average preferences in one sex align with actual average trait levels in the opposite sex. We analyzed correlations and mean differences between self-ratings and ideal partner ratings, and compared average preferences with opposite-sex trait means among 538 Norwegian students, using a survey comprising social dominance orientation (SDO-7) and the IPIP-NEO-60. Both sexes preferred partners similar to themselves on big five traits and SDO, particularly for SDO. Systematic differences also emerged between self-ratings and ideal partner ratings, especially for neuroticism, where both sexes preferred lower levels. We observed mismatches between preferred and actual trait levels—for example, men's average desired agreeableness matched women's average, but women's preferred level exceeded men's actual average. These findings suggest that ideal partner preferences are shaped by one's own traits, especially for political personality, but some traits (e.g., low neuroticism) are broadly preferred across individuals.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Evolution and Human Behavior
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2025.106811
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The attractive personality: Like me, but better

Evolution and Human Behavior
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
article

The attractive personality: Like me, but better

article en

Abstract

People tend to prefer mates who are similar to themselves, yet also desire partners with specific characteristics. The relative importance of assortative and absolute preferences might differ for big five and political personality. We examined partner preferences at the facet level of the big five framework and compared them with preferences regarding a key political personality trait—social dominance orientation (SDO). We also assessed how average preferences in one sex align with actual average trait levels in the opposite sex. We analyzed correlations and mean differences between self-ratings and ideal partner ratings, and compared average preferences with opposite-sex trait means among 538 Norwegian students, using a survey comprising social dominance orientation (SDO-7) and the IPIP-NEO-60. Both sexes preferred partners similar to themselves on big five traits and SDO, particularly for SDO. Systematic differences also emerged between self-ratings and ideal partner ratings, especially for neuroticism, where both sexes preferred lower levels. We observed mismatches between preferred and actual trait levels—for example, men's average desired agreeableness matched women's average, but women's preferred level exceeded men's actual average. These findings suggest that ideal partner preferences are shaped by one's own traits, especially for political personality, but some traits (e.g., low neuroticism) are broadly preferred across individuals.

Evolution and Human BehaviorVol. 47(1)
Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO), The University of Queensland (AU), University of Oslo (NO), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.