To stop or continue counting? Calculating reconviction leading to imprisonment after preventive detention in Norway

In Norway, the ultimate penalty is post-conviction indefinite preventive detention (forvaring), an informal life sentence that can be imposed when a determinate sentence is deemed insufficient to protect society. In this article, we examine reconviction leading to imprisonment among persons who completed their forvaring sentence between 2002 and 2022, drawing on a unique national dataset. Across a range of follow-up periods, reimprisonment rates ranged from 2% for serious offences within two years to 37% overall. Reconviction for serious crimes mostly occurred beyond the usual two- and four-year follow-up periods, with persons convicted of sexual offences showing higher rates of reconviction. We also discuss factors influencing the risk of offending, such as previous convictions, age and sentence progression, and highlight the challenges of predicting future criminal behaviour. As forvaring is intended solely to protect society from serious crimes violating the life, health or freedom of others, we argue that within a risk-management context any assessment of the success or failure of forvaring must be grounded in estimates of reconvictions for such serious crimes within limited follow-up periods.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nordic Journal of Criminology
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18261/njc.27.2.3
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

To stop or continue counting? Calculating reconviction leading to imprisonment after preventive detention in Norway

Nordic Journal of Criminology
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

To stop or continue counting? Calculating reconviction leading to imprisonment after preventive detention in Norway

article en

Abstract

In Norway, the ultimate penalty is post-conviction indefinite preventive detention (forvaring), an informal life sentence that can be imposed when a determinate sentence is deemed insufficient to protect society. In this article, we examine reconviction leading to imprisonment among persons who completed their forvaring sentence between 2002 and 2022, drawing on a unique national dataset. Across a range of follow-up periods, reimprisonment rates ranged from 2% for serious offences within two years to 37% overall. Reconviction for serious crimes mostly occurred beyond the usual two- and four-year follow-up periods, with persons convicted of sexual offences showing higher rates of reconviction. We also discuss factors influencing the risk of offending, such as previous convictions, age and sentence progression, and highlight the challenges of predicting future criminal behaviour. As forvaring is intended solely to protect society from serious crimes violating the life, health or freedom of others, we argue that within a risk-management context any assessment of the success or failure of forvaring must be grounded in estimates of reconvictions for such serious crimes within limited follow-up periods.

Nordic Journal of CriminologyVol. 27(2)
Norwegian Police University College (NO), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), St Olav's University Hospital (NO), Lithuanian Social Research Centre (LT), University College of Norwegian Correctional Service (NO)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions, Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.