A stage-gate decision process for guiding the development of AI solutions for preventive maintenance

The development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) solutions for preventive maintenance applications is a risky and resource-demanding process. Typically, there are several candidate solutions whose performance in transforming data into useful prognostic information is initially uncertain. These uncertainties can be managed by structuring the development process into multiple stages that help choose and implement the final solution. In this paper, we propose such a stage-gate process by using Robust Portfolio Modelling to screen increasingly detailed candidate solutions through four development stages and three decision gates. The development stages generate evidence on how the candidate solutions contribute to six development objectives that represent different financial and technical criteria. At the decision gates, decisions about the continuation/termination of candidate solutions are taken by identifying portfolios of non-dominated candidate solutions subject to time and budget constraints. Uncertainties are captured by admitting incomplete information about the criteria weights and scores of candidate solutions. We illustrate the process by considering the development of an AI solution for a train’s toilet door system. The process brings consistency to the development process and, among other benefits, helps mitigate the risk of missing the development objectives due to premature fixation on a single candidate solution. • A multi-stage decision process based on objectives and criteria is proposed. • Numerical scales are presented to help elicit comparable evaluation statements. • The process can be tailored to many kinds of AI-assisted prognostic tasks. • An illustrative example and a reflective discussion are presented. • The process offers benefits in terms of fostering organisational learning.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EURO Journal on Decision Processes
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejdp.2025.100063
Primary Topic
Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A stage-gate decision process for guiding the development of AI solutions for preventive maintenance

EURO Journal on Decision Processes
Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
article

A stage-gate decision process for guiding the development of AI solutions for preventive maintenance

article en

Abstract

The development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) solutions for preventive maintenance applications is a risky and resource-demanding process. Typically, there are several candidate solutions whose performance in transforming data into useful prognostic information is initially uncertain. These uncertainties can be managed by structuring the development process into multiple stages that help choose and implement the final solution. In this paper, we propose such a stage-gate process by using Robust Portfolio Modelling to screen increasingly detailed candidate solutions through four development stages and three decision gates. The development stages generate evidence on how the candidate solutions contribute to six development objectives that represent different financial and technical criteria. At the decision gates, decisions about the continuation/termination of candidate solutions are taken by identifying portfolios of non-dominated candidate solutions subject to time and budget constraints. Uncertainties are captured by admitting incomplete information about the criteria weights and scores of candidate solutions. We illustrate the process by considering the development of an AI solution for a train’s toilet door system. The process brings consistency to the development process and, among other benefits, helps mitigate the risk of missing the development objectives due to premature fixation on a single candidate solution. • A multi-stage decision process based on objectives and criteria is proposed. • Numerical scales are presented to help elicit comparable evaluation statements. • The process can be tailored to many kinds of AI-assisted prognostic tasks. • An illustrative example and a reflective discussion are presented. • The process offers benefits in terms of fostering organisational learning.

EURO Journal on Decision ProcessesVol. 14
Associazione Regionale Allevatori della Lombardia (IT), Aalto University (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.