Isotopic evidence for changing diet and agriculture in China from the Neolithic to the Early Han period (10-2 ka BP)

This paper examines changing subsistence practices from the Neolithic to the Early Han Dynasty across diverse cultural regions of China. Using a large corpus of stable isotopic data from the literature (N human = 3492; N animal = 2919), we trace spatial and temporal shifts in staple crop use and livestock management. Isotopic evidence reveals marked regional variation in crop-livestock integration from the Neolithic through the Bronze Age. During the Early and Middle Neolithic, isotopic evidence indicates pig husbandry based on the C 4 -plant millet was primarily confined to the Middle Yellow River region, contrasting with an extensive pig management system in the West Liao River and Shandong regions predominantly based on C 3 -plants. From ∼5.5 ka BP, millet agriculture and pig husbandry diffused into the eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, the Hexi Corridor, and western Sichuan. Despite the rapid and widespread adoption of millet agriculture in these agriculturally marginal zones, the overall utilization of pigs and the exploitation of millet-based pig feeding practices remained restricted, especially during the Bronze Age. After 5 ka BP, the introduction of non-native domesticates—such as sheep, goats, cattle, wheat, and barley—gave rise to two distinct agropastoral trajectories between the core agricultural zones and peripheral regions of northern China. In the Middle Yellow River region, an intensive agricultural system based on millet cultivation and pig husbandry persisted, with cattle and sheep rapidly integrated into existing fodder regimes but remaining supplementary to the dominant economy. By contrast, the arid northwestern regions underwent a significant shift toward a mixed agropastoral economy centered on C 3 crops (e.g., wheat and barley) and ruminant livestock, particularly sheep/goat. These regional differences highlight how local ecologies and resource availability shaped flexible but regionally distinct trajectories of crop and livestock integration in prehistoric northern China. • Compiled a large C–N isotopic dataset (N_human=3,492; N_animal=2,919) to reconstruct prehistoric subsistence in China. • Spanning 10–2 ka BP, in five periods and eight regions, we synthesise crop–livestock interactions across China. • Reveals early, persistent millet farming in the Middle Yellow River with C4-fed pig husbandry dominant from Early Neolithic. • From ∼5.5 ka BP, millet expanded into marginal zones, but pig husbandry there varied widely in timing, intensity and diet. • After ∼5 ka BP, farming split: millet–pig systems in Middle Yellow River and C3 crop–pastoral economies in northwest China.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quaternary Science Reviews
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2025.109725
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Isotopic evidence for changing diet and agriculture in China from the Neolithic to the Early Han period (10-2 ka BP)

2 citations
Quaternary Science Reviews
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
8.66
article

Isotopic evidence for changing diet and agriculture in China from the Neolithic to the Early Han period (10-2 ka BP)

article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper examines changing subsistence practices from the Neolithic to the Early Han Dynasty across diverse cultural regions of China. Using a large corpus of stable isotopic data from the literature (N human = 3492; N animal = 2919), we trace spatial and temporal shifts in staple crop use and livestock management. Isotopic evidence reveals marked regional variation in crop-livestock integration from the Neolithic through the Bronze Age. During the Early and Middle Neolithic, isotopic evidence indicates pig husbandry based on the C 4 -plant millet was primarily confined to the Middle Yellow River region, contrasting with an extensive pig management system in the West Liao River and Shandong regions predominantly based on C 3 -plants. From ∼5.5 ka BP, millet agriculture and pig husbandry diffused into the eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, the Hexi Corridor, and western Sichuan. Despite the rapid and widespread adoption of millet agriculture in these agriculturally marginal zones, the overall utilization of pigs and the exploitation of millet-based pig feeding practices remained restricted, especially during the Bronze Age. After 5 ka BP, the introduction of non-native domesticates—such as sheep, goats, cattle, wheat, and barley—gave rise to two distinct agropastoral trajectories between the core agricultural zones and peripheral regions of northern China. In the Middle Yellow River region, an intensive agricultural system based on millet cultivation and pig husbandry persisted, with cattle and sheep rapidly integrated into existing fodder regimes but remaining supplementary to the dominant economy. By contrast, the arid northwestern regions underwent a significant shift toward a mixed agropastoral economy centered on C 3 crops (e.g., wheat and barley) and ruminant livestock, particularly sheep/goat. These regional differences highlight how local ecologies and resource availability shaped flexible but regionally distinct trajectories of crop and livestock integration in prehistoric northern China. • Compiled a large C–N isotopic dataset (N_human=3,492; N_animal=2,919) to reconstruct prehistoric subsistence in China. • Spanning 10–2 ka BP, in five periods and eight regions, we synthesise crop–livestock interactions across China. • Reveals early, persistent millet farming in the Middle Yellow River with C4-fed pig husbandry dominant from Early Neolithic. • From ∼5.5 ka BP, millet expanded into marginal zones, but pig husbandry there varied widely in timing, intensity and diet. • After ∼5 ka BP, farming split: millet–pig systems in Middle Yellow River and C3 crop–pastoral economies in northwest China.

Quaternary Science ReviewsVol. 373
Durham University (GB)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
8.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.