Does environment and health impact economic growth in presence of asymmetries? Evidences from G7 economies using panel nonlinear ARDL

Purpose The aim of this study is to explore the symmetric and asymmetric relationship between economic growth, health and environment across G7 countries from 1960 to 2022. Design/methodology/approach Economic theory suggests that the relationship between economic growth, health and environment tends to be both linear and non-linear. The former relation indicates the presence of symmetries and the latter points to the presence of asymmetries in the system. To analyse the symmetric relationship, this study employs a panel linear autoregressive lag model, while as to analyze the asymmetric relationship, it employs a panel non-linear autoregressive lag model. Panel autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) and NARDL econometric models capture both short- and long-run dynamics, allowing for heterogeneity across countries and identifying non-linear, asymmetric effects of health and environmental variables on economic growth. Findings The results confirm the existence of a stable long-run relationship among the variables. Life expectancy and public health expenditure emerge as the strongest drivers of economic growth, while environmental quality also plays a significant role. Population growth has a comparatively smaller positive impact. Country-specific results reveal heterogeneity, with the USA and France exhibiting faster long-run adjustments and Canada, Italy and Germany showing stronger lagged effects of health spending. Asymmetric effects are particularly pronounced for life expectancy and health expenditure, where positive shocks yield larger economic benefits than the adverse impacts of negative shocks. Research limitations/implications The findings confirm the presence of asymmetric effects, especially for life expectancy and health expenditure in the context of G7 economies, where positive shocks yield greater economic benefits than the adverse impacts of negative shocks. Overall, the study emphasizes the critical importance of sustained investment in health and the environment to foster resilient and inclusive economic growth. Social implications Improved health outcomes and environmental quality not only enhance economic performance but also contribute to social well-being, equity and sustainability, reinforcing the broader development agenda of G7 countries. Originality/value In the context of G7 economies, the relationship between economic growth, health and environment has been analysed in a linear fashion only. To our best knowledge, no research paper has examined this relationship in non-linear fashion, i.e. in the presence of asymmetries. The significance of G7 economies at the global level provides an ideal setting to analyse the asymmetric nexus between economic growth, health and environment. Thereby, this study aims to make a significant contribution to the existing literature.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of economic and administrative sciences.
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jeas-05-2025-0291
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does environment and health impact economic growth in presence of asymmetries? Evidences from G7 economies using panel nonlinear ARDL

Journal of economic and administrative sciences.
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

Does environment and health impact economic growth in presence of asymmetries? Evidences from G7 economies using panel nonlinear ARDL

article en

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study is to explore the symmetric and asymmetric relationship between economic growth, health and environment across G7 countries from 1960 to 2022. Design/methodology/approach Economic theory suggests that the relationship between economic growth, health and environment tends to be both linear and non-linear. The former relation indicates the presence of symmetries and the latter points to the presence of asymmetries in the system. To analyse the symmetric relationship, this study employs a panel linear autoregressive lag model, while as to analyze the asymmetric relationship, it employs a panel non-linear autoregressive lag model. Panel autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) and NARDL econometric models capture both short- and long-run dynamics, allowing for heterogeneity across countries and identifying non-linear, asymmetric effects of health and environmental variables on economic growth. Findings The results confirm the existence of a stable long-run relationship among the variables. Life expectancy and public health expenditure emerge as the strongest drivers of economic growth, while environmental quality also plays a significant role. Population growth has a comparatively smaller positive impact. Country-specific results reveal heterogeneity, with the USA and France exhibiting faster long-run adjustments and Canada, Italy and Germany showing stronger lagged effects of health spending. Asymmetric effects are particularly pronounced for life expectancy and health expenditure, where positive shocks yield larger economic benefits than the adverse impacts of negative shocks. Research limitations/implications The findings confirm the presence of asymmetric effects, especially for life expectancy and health expenditure in the context of G7 economies, where positive shocks yield greater economic benefits than the adverse impacts of negative shocks. Overall, the study emphasizes the critical importance of sustained investment in health and the environment to foster resilient and inclusive economic growth. Social implications Improved health outcomes and environmental quality not only enhance economic performance but also contribute to social well-being, equity and sustainability, reinforcing the broader development agenda of G7 countries. Originality/value In the context of G7 economies, the relationship between economic growth, health and environment has been analysed in a linear fashion only. To our best knowledge, no research paper has examined this relationship in non-linear fashion, i.e. in the presence of asymmetries. The significance of G7 economies at the global level provides an ideal setting to analyse the asymmetric nexus between economic growth, health and environment. Thereby, this study aims to make a significant contribution to the existing literature.

Journal of economic and administrative sciences.
Central University of Kashmir (IN), Vellore Institute of Technology University (IN)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.