EXPANDING THE BORDERS OF HUMANITY

ABSTRACT In The Question of Unworthy Life: Eugenics and Germany's Twentieth Century , historian Dagmar Herzog explores one of the most remarkable transformations in European approaches to human life: the rise and fall of eugenics. In particular, she explores how Germans debated the treatment of people with intellectual disabilities: in the late nineteenth century, doctors, psychiatrists, and Christian caretakers came to equate productivity with worth. They defined people with disabilities as “unworthy” of life, which legitimized mass atrocities such as sterilization and killing under the Nazis and continued to shape their mistreatment during the postwar era. From the 1970s onward, however, a new cohort of activists challenged the eugenicist mindset and launched new campaigns to endow cognitively disabled people with respect and rights. This review essay assesses Herzog's claim that this shift was powered by the activists’ anti‐fascist confrontation with the Nazi past. It argues that their success should also be understood as the product of a broader process: the decline of European efforts to mold “productive” bodies and increase birthrates. Future histories of eugenics’ decline should therefore complement Herzog's illuminative perspective with explaining how advocacy was ironically empowered by growing apathy about productivity.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
History and Theory
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.70018
Primary Topic
Medical History and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EXPANDING THE BORDERS OF HUMANITY

History and Theory
Medical History and Research
article

EXPANDING THE BORDERS OF HUMANITY

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In The Question of Unworthy Life: Eugenics and Germany's Twentieth Century , historian Dagmar Herzog explores one of the most remarkable transformations in European approaches to human life: the rise and fall of eugenics. In particular, she explores how Germans debated the treatment of people with intellectual disabilities: in the late nineteenth century, doctors, psychiatrists, and Christian caretakers came to equate productivity with worth. They defined people with disabilities as “unworthy” of life, which legitimized mass atrocities such as sterilization and killing under the Nazis and continued to shape their mistreatment during the postwar era. From the 1970s onward, however, a new cohort of activists challenged the eugenicist mindset and launched new campaigns to endow cognitively disabled people with respect and rights. This review essay assesses Herzog's claim that this shift was powered by the activists’ anti‐fascist confrontation with the Nazi past. It argues that their success should also be understood as the product of a broader process: the decline of European efforts to mold “productive” bodies and increase birthrates. Future histories of eugenics’ decline should therefore complement Herzog's illuminative perspective with explaining how advocacy was ironically empowered by growing apathy about productivity.

History and Theory
Dartmouth College (US), Dartmouth Hospital (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Medical History and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.