How AI Explanations Affect Trust and Decision-Making: An Experimental Analysis of Explainability Formats

AbstractWe combine subjective measures (trust in the system, perceivedtransparency, perceived usefulness, and self-rated understanding on7-point Likert scales) with behavioral outcomes (decision accuracyagainst ground truth, response time, acceptance/reliance rate, andpatterns of overrides). Calibration is quantified using Brier scores,mean calibration error (the mean absolute discrepancy between statedconfidence and actual accuracy), and reliability diagrams. Primary inferential tests use repeated-measures ANOVA to examine main effectsand interactions of explanation format and AI reliability; mixed-effectsmodels (participant as a random effect, trial as nested observations)probe trial-level variability and order effects. Secondary analyses explore mediation (does perceived understanding mediate the effect ofexplanation type on acceptance?) and moderation by prior AI experience and domain familiarity.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17842610
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How AI Explanations Affect Trust and Decision-Making: An Experimental Analysis of Explainability Formats

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

How AI Explanations Affect Trust and Decision-Making: An Experimental Analysis of Explainability Formats

article en

Abstract

AbstractWe combine subjective measures (trust in the system, perceivedtransparency, perceived usefulness, and self-rated understanding on7-point Likert scales) with behavioral outcomes (decision accuracyagainst ground truth, response time, acceptance/reliance rate, andpatterns of overrides). Calibration is quantified using Brier scores,mean calibration error (the mean absolute discrepancy between statedconfidence and actual accuracy), and reliability diagrams. Primary inferential tests use repeated-measures ANOVA to examine main effectsand interactions of explanation format and AI reliability; mixed-effectsmodels (participant as a random effect, trial as nested observations)probe trial-level variability and order effects. Secondary analyses explore mediation (does perceived understanding mediate the effect ofexplanation type on acceptance?) and moderation by prior AI experience and domain familiarity.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ala-Too International University (KG), International University (KH)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How AI Explanations Affect Trust and Decision-Making: An Experimental Analysis of Explainability Formats · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS