Effects of Evocative Versus Descriptive Game Names On Players' Aesthetic Evaluation

Game names provide a critical first impression, potentially shaping players' aesthetic experiences before gameplay even begins. But how different naming strategies influence player perception remains underexplored. This study investigated the impact of name type, specifically comparing evocative/conceptual names (e.g., 'Stardust Echoes') against descriptive names (e.g., 'Space Shooter'), on players' aesthetic evaluations. Across three experiments using AI-generated game concepts, evocative names consistently yielded higher ratings of liking and interest compared to descriptive or absent names. Furthermore, participants perceived original evocative names as a better fit for the game concepts and were more likely to express an intention to try games bearing such names. These results underscore the importance of a name's conceptual and evocative power, suggesting that names going beyond simple description can significantly boost a game's aesthetic appeal and initial player attraction.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17836886
Primary Topic
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Evocative Versus Descriptive Game Names On Players' Aesthetic Evaluation

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
article

Effects of Evocative Versus Descriptive Game Names On Players' Aesthetic Evaluation

article en

Abstract

Game names provide a critical first impression, potentially shaping players' aesthetic experiences before gameplay even begins. But how different naming strategies influence player perception remains underexplored. This study investigated the impact of name type, specifically comparing evocative/conceptual names (e.g., 'Stardust Echoes') against descriptive names (e.g., 'Space Shooter'), on players' aesthetic evaluations. Across three experiments using AI-generated game concepts, evocative names consistently yielded higher ratings of liking and interest compared to descriptive or absent names. Furthermore, participants perceived original evocative names as a better fit for the game concepts and were more likely to express an intention to try games bearing such names. These results underscore the importance of a name's conceptual and evocative power, suggesting that names going beyond simple description can significantly boost a game's aesthetic appeal and initial player attraction.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Kyonggi University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.