Exchange-Traded Funds vs.Mutual Funds: A Comparative Analysis of Returns and Risks

Over the past quarter century, Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have emerged as one of themost popular passive investment vehicles for both retail and professional investors. Theirappeal lies in features such as low transaction costs, high liquidity, and intraday tradability. Bythe end of 2016, ETFs accounted for over 10% of the total market capitalization traded on U.S.exchanges, while contributing more than 30% to the overall trading volume. ETFs havetransformed the asset management industry, capturing significant market share fromtraditional investment vehicles like mutual funds and index futures.ETFs rely on arbitrage mechanisms to keep their market prices aligned with the net asset values(NAV) of their underlying portfolios, resulting in trading activity that directly influences theunderlying securities. While ETFs have been lauded for enhancing price discovery, researchhighlights potential drawbacks, such as introducing non-fundamental volatility, alteringreturn correlations, and impacting liquidity—particularly during periods of market stress.This paper explores the various types of ETFs available to investors and compares the annualreturns of ETFs with those of mutual funds. Additionally, it examines the associated risks,providing insights into how these instruments behave under different market conditions. Thisstudy contributes to understanding the relative performance, risks, and roles of ETFs andmutual funds in contemporary financial markets.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17836403
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exchange-Traded Funds vs.Mutual Funds: A Comparative Analysis of Returns and Risks

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
article

Exchange-Traded Funds vs.Mutual Funds: A Comparative Analysis of Returns and Risks

article en

Abstract

Over the past quarter century, Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have emerged as one of themost popular passive investment vehicles for both retail and professional investors. Theirappeal lies in features such as low transaction costs, high liquidity, and intraday tradability. Bythe end of 2016, ETFs accounted for over 10% of the total market capitalization traded on U.S.exchanges, while contributing more than 30% to the overall trading volume. ETFs havetransformed the asset management industry, capturing significant market share fromtraditional investment vehicles like mutual funds and index futures.ETFs rely on arbitrage mechanisms to keep their market prices aligned with the net asset values(NAV) of their underlying portfolios, resulting in trading activity that directly influences theunderlying securities. While ETFs have been lauded for enhancing price discovery, researchhighlights potential drawbacks, such as introducing non-fundamental volatility, alteringreturn correlations, and impacting liquidity—particularly during periods of market stress.This paper explores the various types of ETFs available to investors and compares the annualreturns of ETFs with those of mutual funds. Additionally, it examines the associated risks,providing insights into how these instruments behave under different market conditions. Thisstudy contributes to understanding the relative performance, risks, and roles of ETFs andmutual funds in contemporary financial markets.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Poornaprajna Institute of Scientific Research (IN)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.