Reevaluating the Necessity of Dark Matter and Dark Energy within Cosmological Models

The existence of Dark Matter and Dark Energy is widely accepted within the Standard Cosmological Model. However, their introduction is not based on direct detection but rather on the need to reconcile observations with theoretical expectations. This paper explores whether the necessity of Dark Matter and Dark Energy arises inherently from our chosen cosmological framework rather than from an independent physical requirement. Regarding Einstein’s cosmological constant Λ, it was reintroduced into modern physics following supernova observations but, also after carefully analyzing the Baryon Acoustic Oscillations, it is difficult to overlook its connection to the standard cosmological model. The same applies to gravitational lensing, where classical optics is used, with distances estimated based on Redshift. The rotation curves of spiral galaxies have been explained without resorting to alternative gravity models. As for the complex case of elliptical galaxies, in essence they are the result of mergers between spiral galaxies. Based on the model discussed, if one assumes the Milky Way's Initial Mass Function (IMF)—that of a typical spiral—then the dark matter problem for ellipticals reduces to the identical dilemma already posed for spirals. This implies that if dark matter isn't necessary to explain the dynamics of spirals, then it isn't necessary for ellipticals either, which are simply their merger product without the creation of new non-baryonic mass. Our analysis casts doubt on necessity of dark matter in elliptical galaxies, without providing conclusive evidence for a definite alternative. Finally, the current status of direct dark matter detection has been reviewed, which so far has yielded no conclusive results. To properly and comprehensively address a cosmological discussion, we must not focus solely on the standard model but instead consider multiple models. This analysis draws a clear line between its findings and a topic that, by its very nature, inevitably enters a speculative framework. The remaining topic is presented in a pair of final appendices.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17838568
Primary Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reevaluating the Necessity of Dark Matter and Dark Energy within Cosmological Models

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
article

Reevaluating the Necessity of Dark Matter and Dark Energy within Cosmological Models

article en

Abstract

The existence of Dark Matter and Dark Energy is widely accepted within the Standard Cosmological Model. However, their introduction is not based on direct detection but rather on the need to reconcile observations with theoretical expectations. This paper explores whether the necessity of Dark Matter and Dark Energy arises inherently from our chosen cosmological framework rather than from an independent physical requirement. Regarding Einstein’s cosmological constant Λ, it was reintroduced into modern physics following supernova observations but, also after carefully analyzing the Baryon Acoustic Oscillations, it is difficult to overlook its connection to the standard cosmological model. The same applies to gravitational lensing, where classical optics is used, with distances estimated based on Redshift. The rotation curves of spiral galaxies have been explained without resorting to alternative gravity models. As for the complex case of elliptical galaxies, in essence they are the result of mergers between spiral galaxies. Based on the model discussed, if one assumes the Milky Way's Initial Mass Function (IMF)—that of a typical spiral—then the dark matter problem for ellipticals reduces to the identical dilemma already posed for spirals. This implies that if dark matter isn't necessary to explain the dynamics of spirals, then it isn't necessary for ellipticals either, which are simply their merger product without the creation of new non-baryonic mass. Our analysis casts doubt on necessity of dark matter in elliptical galaxies, without providing conclusive evidence for a definite alternative. Finally, the current status of direct dark matter detection has been reviewed, which so far has yielded no conclusive results. To properly and comprehensively address a cosmological discussion, we must not focus solely on the standard model but instead consider multiple models. This analysis draws a clear line between its findings and a topic that, by its very nature, inevitably enters a speculative framework. The remaining topic is presented in a pair of final appendices.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reevaluating the Necessity of Dark Matter and Dark Energy within Cosmological Models · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS