ASSESSING THE ROLE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT IN REGION X STATE UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES AND ITS EFFECT ON REGIONAL INNOVATION DEVELOPMENT

ABSTRACT Intellectual Property (IP) management has become a critical component in strengthening research productivity, technology transfer, and innovation performance in higher education institutions. In Region X, State Universities and Colleges (SUCs) play a pivotal role in advancing knowledge creation and contributing to the regional innovation ecosystem. However, disparities in institutional readiness, policy implementation, and technology transfer practices have created gaps in IP governance. This study analyzed the intellectual property (IP) management practices of specific state universities and colleges (SUCs) in Northern Mindanao and suggested an institutional framework to improve innovation outcomes and reinforce IP governance throughout the region. The study employed a mixed-methods research design combining quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews among 200 respondents composed of faculty researchers, TTO/IPMO staff, administrators, research personnel, and students involved in IP activities. Descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and thematic analysis were used to assess the extent of engagement in IP protection, commercialization, technology transfer, partnerships, and socio-economic contributions. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) was also applied to measure perceived usefulness, ease of use, and behavioral intention towards IP management systems. Findings revealed moderate to high levels of engagement in IP activities among SUCs, with significant variations across institutions. Respondents reported high perceived usefulness and ease of use for IP systems, indicating readiness for improved digital IP governance. Technology transfer initiatives and inter-institutional partnerships were present but not maximized due to structural and policy limitations. ANOVA results confirmed significant differences in IP management strategies among SUCs. The study concludes that a harmonized, adaptable institutional IP management framework is essential to address disparities, strengthen IP governance, and improve innovation performance. Enhancing TTO/IPMO capacities, policy harmonization, and digitalization of IP processes are crucial for supporting regional socio-economic development. The proposed framework positions SUCs in Region X as stronger contributors to the national innovation agenda. ‘ Keywords: Intellectual Property Management, Technology Transfer, Innovation Governance, SUCs, Regional Development, Technology Acceptance Model.