Are We Delivering What Customers Want? Charting Logistics Service Quality Research—A Process View

ABSTRACT Logistics service quality reflects the gap between customers' expectations for logistics service and the actual service they receive, yet it is unclear whether academic research has kept pace with changes in logistics practice over the past 25 years. This article reviews 173 empirical studies on logistics service quality drawn from leading supply chain, logistics, and marketing journals. Using a process – oriented perspective, we develop a framework that categorizes prior work according to antecedents, mechanisms, and outcomes, and we map how different factors collectively shape logistics service quality in both business–to–business and business–to–consumer contexts. Our review shows that, while research has extensively examined firm capabilities, fulfillment performance, and customer attitudes, important gaps remain regarding logistics service quality in nontraditional settings (e.g., reverse and closed–loop supply chains, decentralized supply networks), consistency across channels and service settings, employee management and service failure prevention, interactions among logistics service quality dimensions, consumer participation and heterogeneity, and the social dimension of logistics service quality. We conclude by outlining a future research agenda to address these gaps.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business Logistics
Published
2025-12-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.70050
Primary Topic
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are We Delivering What Customers Want? Charting Logistics Service Quality Research—A Process View

Journal of Business Logistics
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
article

Are We Delivering What Customers Want? Charting Logistics Service Quality Research—A Process View

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Logistics service quality reflects the gap between customers' expectations for logistics service and the actual service they receive, yet it is unclear whether academic research has kept pace with changes in logistics practice over the past 25 years. This article reviews 173 empirical studies on logistics service quality drawn from leading supply chain, logistics, and marketing journals. Using a process – oriented perspective, we develop a framework that categorizes prior work according to antecedents, mechanisms, and outcomes, and we map how different factors collectively shape logistics service quality in both business–to–business and business–to–consumer contexts. Our review shows that, while research has extensively examined firm capabilities, fulfillment performance, and customer attitudes, important gaps remain regarding logistics service quality in nontraditional settings (e.g., reverse and closed–loop supply chains, decentralized supply networks), consistency across channels and service settings, employee management and service failure prevention, interactions among logistics service quality dimensions, consumer participation and heterogeneity, and the social dimension of logistics service quality. We conclude by outlining a future research agenda to address these gaps.

Journal of Business LogisticsVol. 47(1)
Michigan State University (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.