Prioritizing global equity in migration research

Abstract Research shows that global knowledge production is unequal, leading to disparities in understanding across topics, geographies, and populations. This inequality is particularly concerning for critical social and political issues like immigration, one of the most divisive topics worldwide. Using Scopus bibliometric data from 1996 to 2022, we compile a comprehensive corpus of about 125,000 migration-related publications spanning all academic disciplines and interdisciplinary fields. By analyzing their content, we identify gaps, measure missed opportunities, and examine the demographic over- and under-representation of countries. Our findings reveal that some countries and subregions remain systematically underrepresented despite having significant migrant populations. Key factors influencing this underrepresentation include research investment and geographic location, with African countries, Central Asia, and Latin America and the Caribbean being particularly affected. Moreover, emigration (i.e., accumulated outflow) is more strongly linked to a country’s research visibility than immigration (i.e., accumulated inflow). These findings have broad implications for resource allocation in migration research, its societal relevance, and the need for more evidence-based policy debates on migration.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-06308-3
Primary Topic
Migration and Labor Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prioritizing global equity in migration research

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Migration and Labor Dynamics
article

Prioritizing global equity in migration research

article en

Abstract

Abstract Research shows that global knowledge production is unequal, leading to disparities in understanding across topics, geographies, and populations. This inequality is particularly concerning for critical social and political issues like immigration, one of the most divisive topics worldwide. Using Scopus bibliometric data from 1996 to 2022, we compile a comprehensive corpus of about 125,000 migration-related publications spanning all academic disciplines and interdisciplinary fields. By analyzing their content, we identify gaps, measure missed opportunities, and examine the demographic over- and under-representation of countries. Our findings reveal that some countries and subregions remain systematically underrepresented despite having significant migrant populations. Key factors influencing this underrepresentation include research investment and geographic location, with African countries, Central Asia, and Latin America and the Caribbean being particularly affected. Moreover, emigration (i.e., accumulated outflow) is more strongly linked to a country’s research visibility than immigration (i.e., accumulated inflow). These findings have broad implications for resource allocation in migration research, its societal relevance, and the need for more evidence-based policy debates on migration.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 13(1)
University of Leicester (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (DE), University of Rostock (DE)
University of Oxford, Max-Planck-Institut für demografische Forschung
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Migration and Labor Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.