Professional Skepticism and Corporate Transactions

The approval of corporate law transactions under the South African Companies Act 71 of 2008, as amended, is anchored in directors' standards of conduct (that is, the fiduciary duties and the duty of care, skill and diligence) as the primary requirement. It is argued that the standards of conduct of directors as a requirement for the approval of selected fundamental transactions (which require uncompromising objectivity and independence) are inadequate. Professional skepticism – a concept embedded in the work of professional auditors – is proposed as an additional standard for approval of those selected fundamental corporate law transactions. Because professional skepticism goes beyond mere objective considerations of fiduciary duties and the duty of care, skill and diligence; and requires the observance of critical factors such as having a questioning mind and making a critical assessment of transactional evidence, it is best suited for the selected fundamental transactions explained in this article, as these require a high standard of independence and transparency in their approval.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2025/v28i0a21349
Primary Topic
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Professional Skepticism and Corporate Transactions

Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
article

Professional Skepticism and Corporate Transactions

article en

Abstract

The approval of corporate law transactions under the South African Companies Act 71 of 2008, as amended, is anchored in directors' standards of conduct (that is, the fiduciary duties and the duty of care, skill and diligence) as the primary requirement. It is argued that the standards of conduct of directors as a requirement for the approval of selected fundamental transactions (which require uncompromising objectivity and independence) are inadequate. Professional skepticism – a concept embedded in the work of professional auditors – is proposed as an additional standard for approval of those selected fundamental corporate law transactions. Because professional skepticism goes beyond mere objective considerations of fiduciary duties and the duty of care, skill and diligence; and requires the observance of critical factors such as having a questioning mind and making a critical assessment of transactional evidence, it is best suited for the selected fundamental transactions explained in this article, as these require a high standard of independence and transparency in their approval.

Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese RegsbladVol. 28
University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.