Intelligence-Assisted Diagnosis and Treatment Planning in Orthodontics: A Systematic Review

Introduction: The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in orthodontics has rapidly developed in recent years. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness and accuracy of AI applications in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Methods: Data collection in this literature review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Articles published in the last 5 years were screened from various literature sources through PubMed and Science Direct databases. Results: Out of 672 identified articles, 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. The most common AI applications included cephalometric analysis, prediction of extraction needs, and treatment outcome simulations. The majority of studies reported AI accuracy comparable to or better than conventional methods. Several studies demonstrated significant reduction in diagnosis time with the use of AI. Conclusion: Available evidence indicates great potential for AI in improving the accuracy and efficiency of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. However, further research with more rigorous designs and larger sample sizes is needed to validate the effectiveness of AI in daily clinical practice.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17827877
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intelligence-Assisted Diagnosis and Treatment Planning in Orthodontics: A Systematic Review

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Dental Radiography and Imaging
article

Intelligence-Assisted Diagnosis and Treatment Planning in Orthodontics: A Systematic Review

article en

Abstract

Introduction: The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in orthodontics has rapidly developed in recent years. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness and accuracy of AI applications in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Methods: Data collection in this literature review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Articles published in the last 5 years were screened from various literature sources through PubMed and Science Direct databases. Results: Out of 672 identified articles, 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. The most common AI applications included cephalometric analysis, prediction of extraction needs, and treatment outcome simulations. The majority of studies reported AI accuracy comparable to or better than conventional methods. Several studies demonstrated significant reduction in diagnosis time with the use of AI. Conclusion: Available evidence indicates great potential for AI in improving the accuracy and efficiency of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. However, further research with more rigorous designs and larger sample sizes is needed to validate the effectiveness of AI in daily clinical practice.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Universitas Airlangga (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.