Good Intra-EU Mobility or Bad Migration? Perceived Discrimination of the European Movers Amidst Recurring Crises

Abstract Immigration has become an increasingly contentious political issue in Europe, driven in part by recent crises, from the 2008 economic downturn to Brexit and the refugee influx. These events have not only prompted migration within and beyond Europe but have also fueled public debate on immigration and EU mobility, often intensified by right-wing parties. The COVID-19 pandemic temporarily shifted focus away from immigration, yet reignited discussions on border policies soon after. While considerable research examines how immigration salience affects public attitudes, limited attention has been given to how anti-immigrant sentiment directly impacts immigrants, particularly in crisis contexts. This study explores whether EU and non-EU movers’ experiences of discrimination are shaped by anti-immigration narratives linked to the economic crisis, Brexit, and the refugee situation. Using data from the European Social Survey (2002–2020) across 17 countries, this research adopts a large-scale comparative approach to assess if nativist discourses affect EU and non-EU immigrants differently and to identify which EU movers may face discrimination despite their EU citizenship status. Findings indicate that recent crises have modestly heightened discrimination against EU movers, with significant variance influenced by national-level nativist discourses. Some EU movers, however, appear to have been more affected in the long run than others.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Migration and Integration / Revue de l integration et de la migration internationale
Published
2025-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-025-01329-y
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Good Intra-EU Mobility or Bad Migration? Perceived Discrimination of the European Movers Amidst Recurring Crises

Journal of International Migration and Integration / Revue de l integration et de la migration internationale
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
article

Good Intra-EU Mobility or Bad Migration? Perceived Discrimination of the European Movers Amidst Recurring Crises

article en

Abstract

Abstract Immigration has become an increasingly contentious political issue in Europe, driven in part by recent crises, from the 2008 economic downturn to Brexit and the refugee influx. These events have not only prompted migration within and beyond Europe but have also fueled public debate on immigration and EU mobility, often intensified by right-wing parties. The COVID-19 pandemic temporarily shifted focus away from immigration, yet reignited discussions on border policies soon after. While considerable research examines how immigration salience affects public attitudes, limited attention has been given to how anti-immigrant sentiment directly impacts immigrants, particularly in crisis contexts. This study explores whether EU and non-EU movers’ experiences of discrimination are shaped by anti-immigration narratives linked to the economic crisis, Brexit, and the refugee situation. Using data from the European Social Survey (2002–2020) across 17 countries, this research adopts a large-scale comparative approach to assess if nativist discourses affect EU and non-EU immigrants differently and to identify which EU movers may face discrimination despite their EU citizenship status. Findings indicate that recent crises have modestly heightened discrimination against EU movers, with significant variance influenced by national-level nativist discourses. Some EU movers, however, appear to have been more affected in the long run than others.

Journal of International Migration and Integration / Revue de l integration et de la migration internationale
Universidade da Coruña (ES)
Universidade da Coruña
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.