Localization and normalization: The inherent tension in the reconstruction of Chinese sociology

Localization (or Sinicization) and normalization (or professionalization) are two interdependent yet conflicting core issues in the development of Chinese sociology. The push for localization arises from practical demands and a growing sense of academic self-awareness, whereas the emphasis on normalization reflects adherence to universal disciplinary standards and the enduring influence of Western scholarly traditions. This article examines the historical trajectory of localization and normalization within Chinese sociology, exploring the inherent tensions between these two concepts. The analysis focuses on four critical dimensions of normalization: the disciplinary framework, academic institution, discourse system, and methods for handling empirical data. In the ongoing construction of Chinese sociology, neither localization nor normalization should be overlooked. Instead, the tension between them must be strategically navigated. A deliberate synthesis of localization and normalization is crucial – not only for the advancement of Chinese sociology itself but also for local knowledge making meaningful contributions to global sociology.