Zeta potential of glass bead packs — Streaming potential apparatus bench-marking and search for a reference value

Most zeta potential data for consolidated porous samples are obtained using an in-house-built apparatus for streaming potential measurements, without an established benchmarking procedure. It is demonstrated that a commonly used method of result comparison with available literature is unreliable. Therefore, zeta potential measurements were conducted on porous soda lime glass bead packs using two experimental setups: an in-house system and a commercial electrokinetic analyzer. The experiments evaluated the influence of measurement configuration and bead size on electrokinetic responses in sodium chloride solutions. Results show that nominally identical solid–liquid systems can yield distinct zeta potential values depending on the experimental setup, highlighting the importance of measurement configuration and system size in comparative studies. Benchmarking across bead sizes revealed an increase in zeta potential magnitude with decreasing bead radius, contradicting predictions from the modified Helmholtz–Smoluchowski equation for porous media. Additional comparisons with glass plates of similar composition indicate that smaller beads exhibit apparent zeta potential overestimation due to surface reactivity and pH variation. The findings emphasize the coupled effects of surface reactivity and system configuration, supported by a simplified capillary bundle model that, for the first time, captures the experimentally observed trends. • Same solid–brine system can result in different zeta potential in different setups. • Calibration procedure is needed for in-house built streaming potential apparatuses. • Soda lime glass reactivity needs to be accounted for during the zeta potential measurements. • Increasing negative zeta potential with lower bead sizes is due material reactivity.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Colloids and Surfaces A Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2025.139150
Primary Topic
Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Zeta potential of glass bead packs — Streaming potential apparatus bench-marking and search for a reference value

Colloids and Surfaces A Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions
article

Zeta potential of glass bead packs — Streaming potential apparatus bench-marking and search for a reference value

article en

Abstract

Most zeta potential data for consolidated porous samples are obtained using an in-house-built apparatus for streaming potential measurements, without an established benchmarking procedure. It is demonstrated that a commonly used method of result comparison with available literature is unreliable. Therefore, zeta potential measurements were conducted on porous soda lime glass bead packs using two experimental setups: an in-house system and a commercial electrokinetic analyzer. The experiments evaluated the influence of measurement configuration and bead size on electrokinetic responses in sodium chloride solutions. Results show that nominally identical solid–liquid systems can yield distinct zeta potential values depending on the experimental setup, highlighting the importance of measurement configuration and system size in comparative studies. Benchmarking across bead sizes revealed an increase in zeta potential magnitude with decreasing bead radius, contradicting predictions from the modified Helmholtz–Smoluchowski equation for porous media. Additional comparisons with glass plates of similar composition indicate that smaller beads exhibit apparent zeta potential overestimation due to surface reactivity and pH variation. The findings emphasize the coupled effects of surface reactivity and system configuration, supported by a simplified capillary bundle model that, for the first time, captures the experimentally observed trends. • Same solid–brine system can result in different zeta potential in different setups. • Calibration procedure is needed for in-house built streaming potential apparatuses. • Soda lime glass reactivity needs to be accounted for during the zeta potential measurements. • Increasing negative zeta potential with lower bead sizes is due material reactivity.

Colloids and Surfaces A Physicochemical and Engineering AspectsVol. 732
SINTEF (NO), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Anton Paar (Austria) (AT), Ariel University (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Zeta potential of glass bead packs — Streaming potential apparatus bench-marking and search for a reference value · Colloids and Surfaces A Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS