‘Long-term trajectories of return migration: Agrarian differentiation and class mobility in Nepal, Moldova, and Thailand’

Abstract While there is considerable research on return migration, it is disproportionately focused on the immediate moment of return, including decision making. There is an emerging interest, however, in the outcomes for returnees—a policy relevant question at a time when there is growing emphasis on harnessing migration to support rural development. However, limited research has explored the social structures which mediate return migration outcomes, particularly from rural migrant source communities which are facing growing agrarian stress and rising inequality. This article seeks to understand the long-term livelihood trajectories for returnees to rural communities in Nepal, Moldova, and Thailand. Looking at the entire cycle of migration from initial departure to the migration experience overseas, and the options open to returnees, it analyses how outcomes are mediated by ongoing patterns of agrarian differentiation. Drawing upon large surveys, combined with over 100 interviews with households experiencing international labour migration, the article finds that for most returnees, the structural conditions within which rural migrants work overseas, including the associated costs, mean that accumulated savings are rarely sufficient to support transformative change in livelihoods and accumulation of wealth on return. For some migrants, particularly those who are in a subordinate economic position before going overseas, deception or exploitation overseas can result in them returning in an even weaker financial situation, often culminating in a loss of assets. There are, nevertheless, a minority of returnees who have achieved upward mobility in the rural economy following their return. While again, this largely follows class lines with wealthier farmers securing better paid jobs and having less debt, there are a small subset who are able to rise the economic ladder through post-return investments. Effective mobilization of social networks, sustained long term migration and a supportive policy environment—have been cited as significant factors contributing to post-return success within these contexts.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Migration Studies
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnaf040
Primary Topic
Migration and Labor Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Long-term trajectories of return migration: Agrarian differentiation and class mobility in Nepal, Moldova, and Thailand’

Migration Studies
Migration and Labor Dynamics
article

‘Long-term trajectories of return migration: Agrarian differentiation and class mobility in Nepal, Moldova, and Thailand’

article en

Abstract

Abstract While there is considerable research on return migration, it is disproportionately focused on the immediate moment of return, including decision making. There is an emerging interest, however, in the outcomes for returnees—a policy relevant question at a time when there is growing emphasis on harnessing migration to support rural development. However, limited research has explored the social structures which mediate return migration outcomes, particularly from rural migrant source communities which are facing growing agrarian stress and rising inequality. This article seeks to understand the long-term livelihood trajectories for returnees to rural communities in Nepal, Moldova, and Thailand. Looking at the entire cycle of migration from initial departure to the migration experience overseas, and the options open to returnees, it analyses how outcomes are mediated by ongoing patterns of agrarian differentiation. Drawing upon large surveys, combined with over 100 interviews with households experiencing international labour migration, the article finds that for most returnees, the structural conditions within which rural migrants work overseas, including the associated costs, mean that accumulated savings are rarely sufficient to support transformative change in livelihoods and accumulation of wealth on return. For some migrants, particularly those who are in a subordinate economic position before going overseas, deception or exploitation overseas can result in them returning in an even weaker financial situation, often culminating in a loss of assets. There are, nevertheless, a minority of returnees who have achieved upward mobility in the rural economy following their return. While again, this largely follows class lines with wealthier farmers securing better paid jobs and having less debt, there are a small subset who are able to rise the economic ladder through post-return investments. Effective mobilization of social networks, sustained long term migration and a supportive policy environment—have been cited as significant factors contributing to post-return success within these contexts.

Migration StudiesVol. 13(4)
University of Vienna (AT), Institute for Urban and Regional Research (AT), Centre for the Study of Labour and Mobility (NP), University of Birmingham (GB), University of Bologna (IT)
European Commission, Universität Wien
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Migration and Labor Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.