Timing of tyrosine kinase inhibitor switching and long-term outcomes in chronic myeloid leukemia: A real-world comparative study

Abstract Background: In chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), switching tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is often necessary due to intolerance, inadequate response, or resistance. However, the timing of such modifications—whether early after initiation or delayed—may significantly influence long-term clinical outcomes. This study evaluates the comparative safety and effectiveness of early switching (<3 months), late switching (≥6 months), and continued first-line TKI therapy across imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using data from the TriNetX US Collaborative Network. Matched cohorts were constructed for each TKI: imatinib (early n=349, late n=1,309, non-switchers n=4,579), dasatinib (n=377/1,022/2,849), and nilotinib (n=114/370/1,308). Patients who returned to their original TKI or had outcomes of interest prior to switching were excluded. Outcomes—evaluated at 3 and 5 years—included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, diabetes, thromboembolism, hospitalizations, and ICU admissions. Logistic regression was used to calculate risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Across TKIs, early switching was consistently associated with worse outcomes. Imatinib early switchers had higher 5-year mortality compared to both late switchers (24.0% vs. 16.7%; RR=1.43, p=0.018) and non-switchers (24.0% vs. 11.9%; RR=2.03, p<0.001), as well as greater rates of heart failure, hospitalizations, and ICU admissions. Similar patterns were observed with dasatinib, where early switchers had increased 5-year mortality (21.1% vs. 14.0%; p=0.011), heart failure, and ICU use. Nilotinib early switchers showed a trend toward higher mortality and significantly more ICU admissions compared to non-switchers. In contrast, late switching revealed agent-specific effects. Imatinib late switchers had modestly increased 5-year mortality (18.8% vs. 15.5%; p=0.027) and cardiovascular risks, while dasatinib late switchers had outcomes comparable to non-switchers. Nilotinib late switchers experienced similar survival but significantly fewer hospitalizations at 3 years (13.7% vs. 22.1%; RR=0.62, p=0.044). Conclusions: Switch timing in CML has substantial prognostic implications. Early TKI switching, especially within the first 3 months, is associated with higher mortality and complications. Late switching may be better tolerated, particularly with second-generation agents. These findings underscore the need for careful, individualized decision-making in the management of TKI therapy.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-7945
Primary Topic
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Timing of tyrosine kinase inhibitor switching and long-term outcomes in chronic myeloid leukemia: A real-world comparative study

Blood
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
article

Timing of tyrosine kinase inhibitor switching and long-term outcomes in chronic myeloid leukemia: A real-world comparative study

article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: In chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), switching tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is often necessary due to intolerance, inadequate response, or resistance. However, the timing of such modifications—whether early after initiation or delayed—may significantly influence long-term clinical outcomes. This study evaluates the comparative safety and effectiveness of early switching (<3 months), late switching (≥6 months), and continued first-line TKI therapy across imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using data from the TriNetX US Collaborative Network. Matched cohorts were constructed for each TKI: imatinib (early n=349, late n=1,309, non-switchers n=4,579), dasatinib (n=377/1,022/2,849), and nilotinib (n=114/370/1,308). Patients who returned to their original TKI or had outcomes of interest prior to switching were excluded. Outcomes—evaluated at 3 and 5 years—included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, diabetes, thromboembolism, hospitalizations, and ICU admissions. Logistic regression was used to calculate risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Across TKIs, early switching was consistently associated with worse outcomes. Imatinib early switchers had higher 5-year mortality compared to both late switchers (24.0% vs. 16.7%; RR=1.43, p=0.018) and non-switchers (24.0% vs. 11.9%; RR=2.03, p<0.001), as well as greater rates of heart failure, hospitalizations, and ICU admissions. Similar patterns were observed with dasatinib, where early switchers had increased 5-year mortality (21.1% vs. 14.0%; p=0.011), heart failure, and ICU use. Nilotinib early switchers showed a trend toward higher mortality and significantly more ICU admissions compared to non-switchers. In contrast, late switching revealed agent-specific effects. Imatinib late switchers had modestly increased 5-year mortality (18.8% vs. 15.5%; p=0.027) and cardiovascular risks, while dasatinib late switchers had outcomes comparable to non-switchers. Nilotinib late switchers experienced similar survival but significantly fewer hospitalizations at 3 years (13.7% vs. 22.1%; RR=0.62, p=0.044). Conclusions: Switch timing in CML has substantial prognostic implications. Early TKI switching, especially within the first 3 months, is associated with higher mortality and complications. Late switching may be better tolerated, particularly with second-generation agents. These findings underscore the need for careful, individualized decision-making in the management of TKI therapy.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
Montefiore Medical Center (US), Jefferson Einstein Philadelphia Hospital (US), Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.