Is your personal data safer to disclose? An exploratory analysis of reidentification risk

The ubiquity of personal data generated through human-centric devices—such as smartphones and wearable technologies—has intensified concerns over individual privacy and reidentification risk. Despite the implementation of data protection regulations that mandate strict disclosure controls, numerous studies have demonstrated the persistent vulnerability of de-identified datasets. In this study, I conduct a comprehensive risk assessment on a publicly available de-identified dataset, focusing on two dimensions of uniqueness-based risk: sample uniqueness and population uniqueness. The analysis reveals that, under an adversarial knowledge scenario, the probability of correctly reidentifying an individual record reaches 0.35. Furthermore, over 45% of records are susceptible to reidentification when seven quasi-identifiers are known, while even four attributes suffice to reidentify more than 9% of records. The proposed estimation framework achieves accuracy exceeding 75%, outperforming several baseline models. These findings highlight the limitations of existing anonymization techniques and underscore the need for more robust disclosure control mechanisms, particularly for datasets that involve sensitive personal attributes.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17809971
Primary Topic
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is your personal data safer to disclose? An exploratory analysis of reidentification risk

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
article

Is your personal data safer to disclose? An exploratory analysis of reidentification risk

article en

Abstract

The ubiquity of personal data generated through human-centric devices—such as smartphones and wearable technologies—has intensified concerns over individual privacy and reidentification risk. Despite the implementation of data protection regulations that mandate strict disclosure controls, numerous studies have demonstrated the persistent vulnerability of de-identified datasets. In this study, I conduct a comprehensive risk assessment on a publicly available de-identified dataset, focusing on two dimensions of uniqueness-based risk: sample uniqueness and population uniqueness. The analysis reveals that, under an adversarial knowledge scenario, the probability of correctly reidentifying an individual record reaches 0.35. Furthermore, over 45% of records are susceptible to reidentification when seven quasi-identifiers are known, while even four attributes suffice to reidentify more than 9% of records. The proposed estimation framework achieves accuracy exceeding 75%, outperforming several baseline models. These findings highlight the limitations of existing anonymization techniques and underscore the need for more robust disclosure control mechanisms, particularly for datasets that involve sensitive personal attributes.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Open University of Sri Lanka (LK)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.