Canopy management in two dragon fruit species through training systems for sustainable fruit production

• This study evaluated three training systems on white and red dragon fruit cultivars. • The single-pole system demonstrated superior performance, promoting balanced growth, and higher yields. • T-trellis system enhanced vegetative expansion but incurred physiological stress. • The white cultivar exhibited greater adaptability across systems. • The pyramid system showed balancing moderate yield and manageable canopy structure. Dragon fruit ( Hylocereus spp.) cultivation is significantly influenced by training systems, which modulate canopy architecture, light interception, and resource allocation. Understanding the physiological and agronomic impacts of different training methods is essential for optimizing yield and fruit quality. This study evaluated three training systems, single-pole (T 1 ), pyramid stand (T 2 ), and T-trellis (T 3 ), on white ( Hylocereus undatus Britton & Rose) and red ( H. costaricensis Britton & Rose) dragon fruit cultivars, assessing their effects on vegetative growth, reproductive performance, and fruit characteristics. The single-pole system (T 1 ) demonstrated superior performance, promoting balanced growth and higher yields (61 t/ha in T 1 -white) due to improved light distribution and floral initiation (26 days to flowering). In contrast, the T-trellis system (T 3 ) enhanced vegetative expansion (194 cm plant spread in T 3 -white) but incurred physiological stress, including elevated canopy temperatures (43 °C) and photo damage (yellowing intensity up to 3.88), reducing bud retention and yield (28 t/ha in T 3 -white). White cultivars exhibited greater adaptability across systems, while red cultivars performed optimally only in T 1 , achieving superior pulp yield (348 g) and sweetness (16 °Brix). The pyramid system (T 2 ) showed intermediate results, balancing moderate yield and manageable canopy structure. The single-pole system (T 1 ) is the most effective for commercial dragon fruit production, maximizing yield and fruit quality, while minimizing stress-related losses. Cultivar-specific responses highlight the need for tailored training approaches, with white types being more versatile and red types requiring precise management. Future research should explore long-term system viability, climate resilience, and economic feasibility to refine cultivation practices for sustainable production. These findings provide actionable insights for growers to enhance productivity and fruit marketability in diverse agro ecological conditions.

Publication Details

Journal
Scientia Horticulturae
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2025.114545
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Botanical Research and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Canopy management in two dragon fruit species through training systems for sustainable fruit production

1 citations
Scientia Horticulturae
Botanical Research and Applications
1.16
article

Canopy management in two dragon fruit species through training systems for sustainable fruit production

article en
1 citations

Abstract

• This study evaluated three training systems on white and red dragon fruit cultivars. • The single-pole system demonstrated superior performance, promoting balanced growth, and higher yields. • T-trellis system enhanced vegetative expansion but incurred physiological stress. • The white cultivar exhibited greater adaptability across systems. • The pyramid system showed balancing moderate yield and manageable canopy structure. Dragon fruit ( Hylocereus spp.) cultivation is significantly influenced by training systems, which modulate canopy architecture, light interception, and resource allocation. Understanding the physiological and agronomic impacts of different training methods is essential for optimizing yield and fruit quality. This study evaluated three training systems, single-pole (T 1 ), pyramid stand (T 2 ), and T-trellis (T 3 ), on white ( Hylocereus undatus Britton & Rose) and red ( H. costaricensis Britton & Rose) dragon fruit cultivars, assessing their effects on vegetative growth, reproductive performance, and fruit characteristics. The single-pole system (T 1 ) demonstrated superior performance, promoting balanced growth and higher yields (61 t/ha in T 1 -white) due to improved light distribution and floral initiation (26 days to flowering). In contrast, the T-trellis system (T 3 ) enhanced vegetative expansion (194 cm plant spread in T 3 -white) but incurred physiological stress, including elevated canopy temperatures (43 °C) and photo damage (yellowing intensity up to 3.88), reducing bud retention and yield (28 t/ha in T 3 -white). White cultivars exhibited greater adaptability across systems, while red cultivars performed optimally only in T 1 , achieving superior pulp yield (348 g) and sweetness (16 °Brix). The pyramid system (T 2 ) showed intermediate results, balancing moderate yield and manageable canopy structure. The single-pole system (T 1 ) is the most effective for commercial dragon fruit production, maximizing yield and fruit quality, while minimizing stress-related losses. Cultivar-specific responses highlight the need for tailored training approaches, with white types being more versatile and red types requiring precise management. Future research should explore long-term system viability, climate resilience, and economic feasibility to refine cultivation practices for sustainable production. These findings provide actionable insights for growers to enhance productivity and fruit marketability in diverse agro ecological conditions.

Scientia HorticulturaeVol. 355
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Botanical Research and Applications
1.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.