Inotuzumab ozogamicin vs blinatumomab bridging optimization and second CD19 CAR-T efficacy in Relapsed/Refractory B-ALL

Abstract Introduction: Despite advances with CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR-T) in relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL), optimal strategies to bridge patients to CAR-T and manage post-CAR-T relapse remain undefined. The study explored differential efficacy of antibody-based bridging with inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO) versus blinatumomab (BITE) and outcomes of second CAR-T infusions in a real-world cohort. Methods: Twenty-two R/R B-ALL patients treated at our institution (Feb 2020- Mar 2025) with CD19 CAR-T were stratified by bridge agent: INO (n=16) or BITE (n=6; 3 received concurrent intrathecal [IT] chemotherapy for CNS disease). Four received second CAR-T after primary CAR-T failure. Multivariate regression identified factors associated with efficacy and relapse. Results: Our cohort of 22 R/R B-ALL patients (median age 39 years; range 16-69) exhibited 59.1% extramedullary disease (EMD) prevalence and 36.4% BCR::ABL1 positivity, with bridging therapy achieving an overall response rate (CR/PR) of 87.5% in the INO group (n=16; BM blast reduction 85%) versus 66.7% in the Blinatumomab group (n=6; p=0.28), while Blinatumomab combined with intrathecal chemotherapy demonstrated 100% CNS clearance efficacy in all EMD-CNS+ cases. Following CD19 CAR-T infusion, the day 90 CR rate reached 75.0% for INO-bridged and 66.7% for Blinatumomab-bridged patients (p=0.62), though multivariable analysis identified baseline EMD (HR 3.9; 95%CI 1.2-12.7) and epigenetic mutations (DNMT3A/ASXL1/TET2; HR 4.2; 95%CI 1.4-12.9) as significant relapse predictors. All subjects exhibited peripheral blood CAR-T expansion detectable via ddPCR, in INO-bridged group reaching a median peak level of 53400 copies/μg DNA by (range: 21800-153680) at median peak time of day 8 after CAR-T infusion, while in Blinatumomab-bridged reaching a median peak level of 46700 copies/μg DNA by (range: 14390-10240) at median peak time of day 7after CAR-T infusion. Among four patients receiving second CAR-T after primary failure, 75% (3/4) achieved CR when bridge therapy was optimized through agent-switch or combination strategies (e.g., INO switched to Blinatumomab), yielding a median PFS of 8 months. Safety monitoring showed 77.3% experienced grade 1-2 CRS, 22.7% grade 1 ICANS, and two grade 3 VOD cases in the INO cohort. The 1-year overall survival remained comparable between bridging arms (INO:80% vs Blinatumomab:83%; p=0.91). Conclusion: INO achieves superior marrow debulking in high-tumor-burden patients, while Blinatumomab with intrathecal chemotherapy facilitates complete CNS disease eradication; retreatment with CD19 CAR-T induces remission in 75% of primary-refractory cases when bridging is optimized via agent-switch or combination strategies, albeit with limited durability; and critically, epigenetic mutations (DNMT3A/ASXL1) constitute the highest-risk molecular subgroup, mandating development of novel maintenance therapies.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-2398
Primary Topic
CAR-T cell therapy research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inotuzumab ozogamicin vs blinatumomab bridging optimization and second CD19 CAR-T efficacy in Relapsed/Refractory B-ALL

Blood
CAR-T cell therapy research
article

Inotuzumab ozogamicin vs blinatumomab bridging optimization and second CD19 CAR-T efficacy in Relapsed/Refractory B-ALL

article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Despite advances with CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR-T) in relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL), optimal strategies to bridge patients to CAR-T and manage post-CAR-T relapse remain undefined. The study explored differential efficacy of antibody-based bridging with inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO) versus blinatumomab (BITE) and outcomes of second CAR-T infusions in a real-world cohort. Methods: Twenty-two R/R B-ALL patients treated at our institution (Feb 2020- Mar 2025) with CD19 CAR-T were stratified by bridge agent: INO (n=16) or BITE (n=6; 3 received concurrent intrathecal [IT] chemotherapy for CNS disease). Four received second CAR-T after primary CAR-T failure. Multivariate regression identified factors associated with efficacy and relapse. Results: Our cohort of 22 R/R B-ALL patients (median age 39 years; range 16-69) exhibited 59.1% extramedullary disease (EMD) prevalence and 36.4% BCR::ABL1 positivity, with bridging therapy achieving an overall response rate (CR/PR) of 87.5% in the INO group (n=16; BM blast reduction 85%) versus 66.7% in the Blinatumomab group (n=6; p=0.28), while Blinatumomab combined with intrathecal chemotherapy demonstrated 100% CNS clearance efficacy in all EMD-CNS+ cases. Following CD19 CAR-T infusion, the day 90 CR rate reached 75.0% for INO-bridged and 66.7% for Blinatumomab-bridged patients (p=0.62), though multivariable analysis identified baseline EMD (HR 3.9; 95%CI 1.2-12.7) and epigenetic mutations (DNMT3A/ASXL1/TET2; HR 4.2; 95%CI 1.4-12.9) as significant relapse predictors. All subjects exhibited peripheral blood CAR-T expansion detectable via ddPCR, in INO-bridged group reaching a median peak level of 53400 copies/μg DNA by (range: 21800-153680) at median peak time of day 8 after CAR-T infusion, while in Blinatumomab-bridged reaching a median peak level of 46700 copies/μg DNA by (range: 14390-10240) at median peak time of day 7after CAR-T infusion. Among four patients receiving second CAR-T after primary failure, 75% (3/4) achieved CR when bridge therapy was optimized through agent-switch or combination strategies (e.g., INO switched to Blinatumomab), yielding a median PFS of 8 months. Safety monitoring showed 77.3% experienced grade 1-2 CRS, 22.7% grade 1 ICANS, and two grade 3 VOD cases in the INO cohort. The 1-year overall survival remained comparable between bridging arms (INO:80% vs Blinatumomab:83%; p=0.91). Conclusion: INO achieves superior marrow debulking in high-tumor-burden patients, while Blinatumomab with intrathecal chemotherapy facilitates complete CNS disease eradication; retreatment with CD19 CAR-T induces remission in 75% of primary-refractory cases when bridging is optimized via agent-switch or combination strategies, albeit with limited durability; and critically, epigenetic mutations (DNMT3A/ASXL1) constitute the highest-risk molecular subgroup, mandating development of novel maintenance therapies.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
Union Hospital (HK), Wuhan Union Hospital (CN), Shanghai Cell Therapy Research Institute (CN), Union Hospital (CN), Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
CAR-T cell therapy research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.