Input to the UN Working Group on Business and Human Rights

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY International standards mandate working with Indigenous Peoples through Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC), but both States and businesses systematically fail to operationalize FPIC effectively. This input offers recommendations grounded in Indigenous legal systems and a regenerative business model. The prevailing business and human rights discourse frames FPIC primarily as a mechanism for distributing “benefits” to Indigenous Peoples affected by business operations. Under this view, FPIC becomes a checkbox process where businesses offer compensation packages—jobs, infrastructure, benefit-sharing—in exchange for Indigenous Peoples’ approval. The implicit assumption is that communities are “charity” actors who will consent when “benefits” outweigh costs. It reduces FPIC to a transactional exchange and transforms Indigenous communities from rights-holders into benefit-recipients. The “benefits” mythology creates several dangerous distortions. This input proposes a pathway: Embedding FPIC within Indigenous governance systems rather than imposing external consultation processes. This requires three shifts: (1) recognizing Indigenous law as the primary authority in Indigenous territories; (2) creating Indigenous-led governance of business activities; and (3) structuring diplomatic benefit negotiations to flow directly to Indigenous communities rather than intermediaries.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17797518
Primary Topic
Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Input to the UN Working Group on Business and Human Rights

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
article

Input to the UN Working Group on Business and Human Rights

article en

Abstract

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY International standards mandate working with Indigenous Peoples through Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC), but both States and businesses systematically fail to operationalize FPIC effectively. This input offers recommendations grounded in Indigenous legal systems and a regenerative business model. The prevailing business and human rights discourse frames FPIC primarily as a mechanism for distributing “benefits” to Indigenous Peoples affected by business operations. Under this view, FPIC becomes a checkbox process where businesses offer compensation packages—jobs, infrastructure, benefit-sharing—in exchange for Indigenous Peoples’ approval. The implicit assumption is that communities are “charity” actors who will consent when “benefits” outweigh costs. It reduces FPIC to a transactional exchange and transforms Indigenous communities from rights-holders into benefit-recipients. The “benefits” mythology creates several dangerous distortions. This input proposes a pathway: Embedding FPIC within Indigenous governance systems rather than imposing external consultation processes. This requires three shifts: (1) recognizing Indigenous law as the primary authority in Indigenous territories; (2) creating Indigenous-led governance of business activities; and (3) structuring diplomatic benefit negotiations to flow directly to Indigenous communities rather than intermediaries.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Karnataka State Law University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.