Clinically Oriented Evaluation of Transfer Learning Strategies for Cross-Site Breast Cancer Histopathology Classification

Background/Objectives: Breast cancer diagnosis based on histopathological examination remains the most reliable and widely accepted approach in clinical practice, despite being time-consuming and prone to inter-observer variability. While deep learning methods have achieved high accuracy in medical image classification, their cross-site generalization remains limited due to differences in staining protocols and image acquisition. This study aims to evaluate and compare three clinically relevant adaptation strategies to improve model robustness under domain shift. Methods: The ResNet50V2 model, pretrained on ImageNet and further fine-tuned on the Kaggle Breast Histopathology Images dataset, was subsequently adapted to the BreaKHis dataset under three clinically relevant transfer strategies: (i) threshold calibration without retraining (site calibration), (ii) head-only fine-tuning (light FT), and (iii) full fine-tuning (full FT). Experiments were performed on an internal balanced dataset and on the public BreaKHis dataset using strict patient-level splitting to avoid data leakage. Evaluation metrics included accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, ROC-AUC, and PR-AUC, computed per magnification level (40×, 100×, 200×, 400×). Results: Full fine-tuning consistently yielded the highest performance across all magnifications, reaching up to 0.983 ROC-AUC and 0.980 sensitivity at 400×. At 40× and 100×, the model correctly identified over 90% of malignant cases, with ROC-AUC values of 0.9500 and 0.9332, respectively. Head-only fine-tuning led to moderate gains (e.g., sensitivity up to 0.859 at 200×), while threshold calibration showed limited improvements (ROC-AUC ranging between 0.60–0.73). Grad-CAM analysis revealed more stable and focused attention maps after full fine-tuning, though they did not always align with diagnostically relevant regions. Conclusions: Our findings confirm that full fine-tuning is essential for robust cross-site deployment of histopathology AI systems, particularly at high magnifications. Lighter strategies such as threshold calibration or head-only fine-tuning may serve as practical alternatives in resource-constrained environments where retraining is not feasible.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app152312819
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinically Oriented Evaluation of Transfer Learning Strategies for Cross-Site Breast Cancer Histopathology Classification

Applied Sciences
AI in cancer detection
article

Clinically Oriented Evaluation of Transfer Learning Strategies for Cross-Site Breast Cancer Histopathology Classification

article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Breast cancer diagnosis based on histopathological examination remains the most reliable and widely accepted approach in clinical practice, despite being time-consuming and prone to inter-observer variability. While deep learning methods have achieved high accuracy in medical image classification, their cross-site generalization remains limited due to differences in staining protocols and image acquisition. This study aims to evaluate and compare three clinically relevant adaptation strategies to improve model robustness under domain shift. Methods: The ResNet50V2 model, pretrained on ImageNet and further fine-tuned on the Kaggle Breast Histopathology Images dataset, was subsequently adapted to the BreaKHis dataset under three clinically relevant transfer strategies: (i) threshold calibration without retraining (site calibration), (ii) head-only fine-tuning (light FT), and (iii) full fine-tuning (full FT). Experiments were performed on an internal balanced dataset and on the public BreaKHis dataset using strict patient-level splitting to avoid data leakage. Evaluation metrics included accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, ROC-AUC, and PR-AUC, computed per magnification level (40×, 100×, 200×, 400×). Results: Full fine-tuning consistently yielded the highest performance across all magnifications, reaching up to 0.983 ROC-AUC and 0.980 sensitivity at 400×. At 40× and 100×, the model correctly identified over 90% of malignant cases, with ROC-AUC values of 0.9500 and 0.9332, respectively. Head-only fine-tuning led to moderate gains (e.g., sensitivity up to 0.859 at 200×), while threshold calibration showed limited improvements (ROC-AUC ranging between 0.60–0.73). Grad-CAM analysis revealed more stable and focused attention maps after full fine-tuning, though they did not always align with diagnostically relevant regions. Conclusions: Our findings confirm that full fine-tuning is essential for robust cross-site deployment of histopathology AI systems, particularly at high magnifications. Lighter strategies such as threshold calibration or head-only fine-tuning may serve as practical alternatives in resource-constrained environments where retraining is not feasible.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(23)
University of Craiova (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.