Revisiting the Leontief Paradox From a Value‐Added Trade Perspective

ABSTRACT This study revisits a well‐known thesis in international trade theory—the Leontief paradox—from a value‐added trade perspective within a global industrial linkage framework. Using the Heckscher–Ohlin model as a foundation, this paper employs world input–output tables and socioeconomic accounts compiled by the European Union to calculate the value added embodied in bilateral trade for specific economies. The analysis computes the capital‐to‐labor ratios of all traded goods for these economies from 2000 to 2014, aiming to identify the potential existence of the Leontief paradox. Our findings reveal that the Leontief paradox appears in many instances in the United States, especially within the services sector. However, when the value‐added trade concept is applied, the paradox is observed only in a few bilateral cases in the services sector. By contrast, the Leontief paradox is almost nonexistent in India, as a developing country with an abundant labor endowment, whether from a conventional trade perspective or a value‐added trade one is used.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of International Economics
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.70037
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting the Leontief Paradox From a Value‐Added Trade Perspective

Review of International Economics
Global trade and economics
article

Revisiting the Leontief Paradox From a Value‐Added Trade Perspective

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study revisits a well‐known thesis in international trade theory—the Leontief paradox—from a value‐added trade perspective within a global industrial linkage framework. Using the Heckscher–Ohlin model as a foundation, this paper employs world input–output tables and socioeconomic accounts compiled by the European Union to calculate the value added embodied in bilateral trade for specific economies. The analysis computes the capital‐to‐labor ratios of all traded goods for these economies from 2000 to 2014, aiming to identify the potential existence of the Leontief paradox. Our findings reveal that the Leontief paradox appears in many instances in the United States, especially within the services sector. However, when the value‐added trade concept is applied, the paradox is observed only in a few bilateral cases in the services sector. By contrast, the Leontief paradox is almost nonexistent in India, as a developing country with an abundant labor endowment, whether from a conventional trade perspective or a value‐added trade one is used.

Review of International Economics
Chung Yuan Christian University (TW), Fujian Jiangxia University (CN), National Taipei University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Global trade and economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.