Planning with infrastructures in the face of austerity:

About fifteen years after the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), land-use planning practices remain largely unchanged worldwide, even in regions affected by austerity and reduced public spending. Moreover, critical research on crisis, austerity, and urban dynamics often overlooks land-use planning, creating a disconnect from planners’ everyday realities. This is particularly relevant in areas undergoing extended urbanisation, such as Portugal. The austerity measures triggered by the GFC in Portugal exposed significant shortcomings in its spatial planning system, including its rigidity and inability to adapt to socio-spatial contexts marked by dispersed urbanisation alongside demographic and economic decline. Using action-research methodologies, this study explored opportunities arising from the crisis and developed a procedural tool, Infrastructures vs Building (IvB), which leverages infrastructure as a reference point for land-use planning. IvB strengthens Portugal’s planning system by challenging expansionist urban paradigms and providing quantified infrastructure data for land-use classification. Beyond diagnosis, IvB offers a practical framework for integrating infrastructure networks into land-use planning, with relevance for Portugal and other contexts. The GFC-induced austerity measures in Portugal exposed significant flaws in its spatial planning system, including its rigidity and failure to adapt to socio-spatial realities marked by dispersed urbanization alongside demographic and economic decline. Using action-research methodologies, the study explored opportunities arising from the crisis. It developed a procedural tool, Infrastructures vs Building (IvB), leveraging infrastructure as a reference point for land use planning. IvB enhances Portugal’s planning system by challenging expansionist urban paradigms and offering quantified infrastructure data for land use classification. Beyond diagnosis, IvB provides a practical platform to emphasize infrastructure networks in land use planning, with relevance in Portugal and other contexts.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)
Published
2024-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18055/finis39141
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Planning with infrastructures in the face of austerity:

Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)
Urban Planning and Governance
article

Planning with infrastructures in the face of austerity:

article en

Abstract

About fifteen years after the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), land-use planning practices remain largely unchanged worldwide, even in regions affected by austerity and reduced public spending. Moreover, critical research on crisis, austerity, and urban dynamics often overlooks land-use planning, creating a disconnect from planners’ everyday realities. This is particularly relevant in areas undergoing extended urbanisation, such as Portugal. The austerity measures triggered by the GFC in Portugal exposed significant shortcomings in its spatial planning system, including its rigidity and inability to adapt to socio-spatial contexts marked by dispersed urbanisation alongside demographic and economic decline. Using action-research methodologies, this study explored opportunities arising from the crisis and developed a procedural tool, Infrastructures vs Building (IvB), which leverages infrastructure as a reference point for land-use planning. IvB strengthens Portugal’s planning system by challenging expansionist urban paradigms and providing quantified infrastructure data for land-use classification. Beyond diagnosis, IvB offers a practical framework for integrating infrastructure networks into land-use planning, with relevance for Portugal and other contexts. The GFC-induced austerity measures in Portugal exposed significant flaws in its spatial planning system, including its rigidity and failure to adapt to socio-spatial realities marked by dispersed urbanization alongside demographic and economic decline. Using action-research methodologies, the study explored opportunities arising from the crisis. It developed a procedural tool, Infrastructures vs Building (IvB), leveraging infrastructure as a reference point for land use planning. IvB enhances Portugal’s planning system by challenging expansionist urban paradigms and offering quantified infrastructure data for land use classification. Beyond diagnosis, IvB provides a practical platform to emphasize infrastructure networks in land use planning, with relevance in Portugal and other contexts.

Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)
Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (RU), Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales (ES)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Urban Planning and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.