Effect of polishing sequence on the surface roughness and flexural strength of additively or subtractively manufactured zirconia.

Purpose Achieving optimal surface roughness and flexural strength for zirconia, regardless of whether it is produced using additive or subtractive manufacturing, remains a challenge. Moreover, the effect of polishing protocol timing, relative to sintering, on those properties is not comprehensively known yet. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of the timing of polishing, considering the sintering stage, on the surface roughness and flexural strength of additively or subtractively manufactured 3Y-TZP zirconia. Materials And Methods Disc-shaped (n = 40) and bar-shaped (n = 64) zirconia specimens were either subtractively manufactured (SM) or additively manufactured (AM) for surface roughness measurements and flexural strength tests, respectively. Specimens were polished following different protocols depending on timing: before sintering, before and after sintering, after sintering, and some received no polishing. Surface roughness was measured with a noncontact optical profilometer at each stage. Flexural strength was assessed using a three-point bending test according to ISO 6872:2015. The data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and post hoc tests to evaluate the effects of material type and polishing protocol on the surface roughness and flexural strength (α = 0.05). Results The lowest Ra values were recorded when polishing was done before and after sintering (AM: 0.22 ± 0.03 µm; SM: 0.18 ± 0.02 µm) (p ≤ 0.05). AM zirconia specimens demonstrated a greater reduction in surface roughness compared to SM across all polishing protocols (p < 0.001). The highest flexural strength was recorded in specimens polished before and after sintering in the AM group (1049.98 ± 71.61 MPa) (p ≤ 0.05). Conclusions Polishing performed both before and after sintering enabled clinically acceptable surface roughness for AM zirconia. In all polished specimens, AM specimens polished before and after sintering had the highest flexural strength.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/92819
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of polishing sequence on the surface roughness and flexural strength of additively or subtractively manufactured zirconia.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Dental materials and restorations
article

Effect of polishing sequence on the surface roughness and flexural strength of additively or subtractively manufactured zirconia.

article en

Abstract

Purpose Achieving optimal surface roughness and flexural strength for zirconia, regardless of whether it is produced using additive or subtractive manufacturing, remains a challenge. Moreover, the effect of polishing protocol timing, relative to sintering, on those properties is not comprehensively known yet. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of the timing of polishing, considering the sintering stage, on the surface roughness and flexural strength of additively or subtractively manufactured 3Y-TZP zirconia. Materials And Methods Disc-shaped (n = 40) and bar-shaped (n = 64) zirconia specimens were either subtractively manufactured (SM) or additively manufactured (AM) for surface roughness measurements and flexural strength tests, respectively. Specimens were polished following different protocols depending on timing: before sintering, before and after sintering, after sintering, and some received no polishing. Surface roughness was measured with a noncontact optical profilometer at each stage. Flexural strength was assessed using a three-point bending test according to ISO 6872:2015. The data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and post hoc tests to evaluate the effects of material type and polishing protocol on the surface roughness and flexural strength (α = 0.05). Results The lowest Ra values were recorded when polishing was done before and after sintering (AM: 0.22 ± 0.03 µm; SM: 0.18 ± 0.02 µm) (p ≤ 0.05). AM zirconia specimens demonstrated a greater reduction in surface roughness compared to SM across all polishing protocols (p < 0.001). The highest flexural strength was recorded in specimens polished before and after sintering in the AM group (1049.98 ± 71.61 MPa) (p ≤ 0.05). Conclusions Polishing performed both before and after sintering enabled clinically acceptable surface roughness for AM zirconia. In all polished specimens, AM specimens polished before and after sintering had the highest flexural strength.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
University of Dental Medicine (MM)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.