Are Neural Networks Better than Machine Learning? A Comparative Study for Travel Mode Predictions

Predicting how people choose their travel modes accurately is important in the transportation field. Machine learning (ML) and neural networks (NNs) have gradually become popular in recent years. However, which is better is seldom discussed in previous studies. Therefore, we collect several real-world travel datasets from different countries, and pick five typical ML models, six classic NN models, and ten new NN models for comparison. Some methods for improvement are also considered, including SMOTE, Near-Miss, and using focal loss. The results show that, when looking at the F1-score, the NN models do not perform as well as ML models. While the performances of different classic NN models are similar, making the neural network more complex does not improve the prediction results. Some new NN models can reach the level of ML models on small datasets, but they still perform poorly on large datasets. Due to such a result, we further discuss two important topics: why NN models are not as good as compared to the ones in some other fields, and why this phenomenon is not revealed in many previous papers. In summary, we think this study gives a good reference for future research on predicting travel modes and choosing the right models.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systems
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13121099
Primary Topic
Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are Neural Networks Better than Machine Learning? A Comparative Study for Travel Mode Predictions

Systems
Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
article

Are Neural Networks Better than Machine Learning? A Comparative Study for Travel Mode Predictions

article en

Abstract

Predicting how people choose their travel modes accurately is important in the transportation field. Machine learning (ML) and neural networks (NNs) have gradually become popular in recent years. However, which is better is seldom discussed in previous studies. Therefore, we collect several real-world travel datasets from different countries, and pick five typical ML models, six classic NN models, and ten new NN models for comparison. Some methods for improvement are also considered, including SMOTE, Near-Miss, and using focal loss. The results show that, when looking at the F1-score, the NN models do not perform as well as ML models. While the performances of different classic NN models are similar, making the neural network more complex does not improve the prediction results. Some new NN models can reach the level of ML models on small datasets, but they still perform poorly on large datasets. Due to such a result, we further discuss two important topics: why NN models are not as good as compared to the ones in some other fields, and why this phenomenon is not revealed in many previous papers. In summary, we think this study gives a good reference for future research on predicting travel modes and choosing the right models.

SystemsVol. 13(12)
National University of Singapore (SG), Southeast University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.