Temporal trends in incidence and survival of Acute Myeloid Leukemia by age group: A SEER based analysis (2000–2022)

Abstract Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous and aggressive hematologic malignancy with a particularly poor prognosis in older adults. Over the past two decades, treatment options have expanded significantly with the introduction of hypomethylating agents and targeted therapies, but the population-level effects of these innovations on survival remain incompletely understood. We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using the SEER 17 database, studying AML cases diagnosed from 2000 to 2022. Patients were stratified into five age groups; 0–14, 15–39, 40–64, 65–74, and 75+ years, and the study period was divided into four therapeutic eras: 2000–2005, pre-modern therapies, 2006–2010, early treatment changes, 2011–2015, hypomethylating agent era, and 2016–2022, targeted therapy era. For each group and era, we calculated incidence and estimated observed and relative survival at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months. AML incidence remained highest in older adults across the entire study period, with little variation over time. Relative 5-year survival improved in all age groups, though gains were uneven. The pediatric group (0–14 years) saw an increase from 62.2% to 69.1%, and the 15–39 age group improved from 50.6% to 66.1%. The 40–64 group increased from 27.9% to 44.4%, while adults aged 65–74 experienced a survial rise from 9.3% to 19.6%. The oldest group (75+) showed small survival improvement, from 1.9% to 4.7%. While the most dramatic improvements were observed in patients under 40, there were modest but notable gains among adults aged 65 and older, especially during the targeted therapy era. These trends reflect a combination of more effective frontline regimens, better supportive care, and greater access to molecular diagnostics and novel agents. However, outcomes for older patients remain poor, likely due to age-related comorbidities, reduced treatment tolerance, and underrepresentation in clinical trials. Our findings highlight both progress and ongoing disparities in AML care. Despite meaningful survival improvements since 2000, especially among younger and middle-aged adults, elderly patients continue to face disproportionately poor outcomes. This underscores the need for age-adapted therapeutic strategies and further innovation in treating geriatric AML. In an era of personalized medicine, expanding access to less toxic therapies and improving inclusion of older adults in clinical research will be essential to closing the survival gap.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-8162
Primary Topic
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Temporal trends in incidence and survival of Acute Myeloid Leukemia by age group: A SEER based analysis (2000–2022)

Blood
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
article

Temporal trends in incidence and survival of Acute Myeloid Leukemia by age group: A SEER based analysis (2000–2022)

article en

Abstract

Abstract Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous and aggressive hematologic malignancy with a particularly poor prognosis in older adults. Over the past two decades, treatment options have expanded significantly with the introduction of hypomethylating agents and targeted therapies, but the population-level effects of these innovations on survival remain incompletely understood. We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using the SEER 17 database, studying AML cases diagnosed from 2000 to 2022. Patients were stratified into five age groups; 0–14, 15–39, 40–64, 65–74, and 75+ years, and the study period was divided into four therapeutic eras: 2000–2005, pre-modern therapies, 2006–2010, early treatment changes, 2011–2015, hypomethylating agent era, and 2016–2022, targeted therapy era. For each group and era, we calculated incidence and estimated observed and relative survival at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months. AML incidence remained highest in older adults across the entire study period, with little variation over time. Relative 5-year survival improved in all age groups, though gains were uneven. The pediatric group (0–14 years) saw an increase from 62.2% to 69.1%, and the 15–39 age group improved from 50.6% to 66.1%. The 40–64 group increased from 27.9% to 44.4%, while adults aged 65–74 experienced a survial rise from 9.3% to 19.6%. The oldest group (75+) showed small survival improvement, from 1.9% to 4.7%. While the most dramatic improvements were observed in patients under 40, there were modest but notable gains among adults aged 65 and older, especially during the targeted therapy era. These trends reflect a combination of more effective frontline regimens, better supportive care, and greater access to molecular diagnostics and novel agents. However, outcomes for older patients remain poor, likely due to age-related comorbidities, reduced treatment tolerance, and underrepresentation in clinical trials. Our findings highlight both progress and ongoing disparities in AML care. Despite meaningful survival improvements since 2000, especially among younger and middle-aged adults, elderly patients continue to face disproportionately poor outcomes. This underscores the need for age-adapted therapeutic strategies and further innovation in treating geriatric AML. In an era of personalized medicine, expanding access to less toxic therapies and improving inclusion of older adults in clinical research will be essential to closing the survival gap.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
Citigroup (US), Hill Engineering (United States) (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.