YOLO-based crater detection for cislunar autonomous optical navigation: Characterization and parametric analysis of angular and area measurement errors

Optical navigation (OpNav) will play an important role in the development of cislunar (i.e., Earth–Moon system) autonomous navigation. The introduction of deep learning in recent years has paved a new path for computer vision to be explored. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) can be trained to interpret images of a desired destination and accurately mark key features on its surface. In this paper, the application of CNNs to detect lunar craters for autonomous optical navigation is explored beyond previous implementations such as terrain-relative navigation (TRN), which are constrained to low lunar orbits ( < 100 km). More specifically, the state-of-the-art, real-time object detection algorithm YOLO (You Only Look Once) is trained with a comprehensive dataset of realistic, synthetically generated Moon images at a range of illumination conditions and distances (up to 71 , 250 km). A comprehensive analysis of line-of-sight and crater-area estimations is also performed as a function of relevant factors (e.g., distance, crater radii, solar-incidence angle, etc.) to inform on the usability of crater detections for autonomous navigation. We found that for a spacecraft orbiting the Moon, a CNN can robustly generalize the detection of surface craters for various illumination conditions and outside of its training range ( 2500 − 100 , 000 km ( ≈ 0 . 1 − 14 km/pixel ground sample distance (GSD))), with performance primarily influenced by crater size, distance to the surface, solar-phase angle, and spacecraft-emission angle. For the following factor ranges (evaluated independently), crater radius 32 − 64 px, distance 3250 − 45 , 000 km, solar-phase angles 30 ° − 135 ° , and spacecraft-emission angles < 60 ° , the model achieved mean crater area error 4 . 9 % − 5 . 8 % , mean normalized angular error 0 . 03 % − 0 . 07 % , and mean confidence 87 % − 91 % . Findings demonstrate the potential of CNNs applied to cislunar OpNav in orbit and provide a comprehensive characterization of measurement accuracies that could be further leveraged for feasibility analyses of autonomous missions. • Demonstrated a crater detection model that could detect craters up to 100 , 000 km. • Quantified how certain factors (radius, distance, etc.) drive detection accuracy. • Defined an OpNav Usability Envelope for crater detection up to 71 , 250 km. • Offered guidance for crater selection and imaging geometries for future missions.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Astronautica
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2025.11.074
Primary Topic
Planetary Science and Exploration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

YOLO-based crater detection for cislunar autonomous optical navigation: Characterization and parametric analysis of angular and area measurement errors

Acta Astronautica
Planetary Science and Exploration
article

YOLO-based crater detection for cislunar autonomous optical navigation: Characterization and parametric analysis of angular and area measurement errors

article en

Abstract

Optical navigation (OpNav) will play an important role in the development of cislunar (i.e., Earth–Moon system) autonomous navigation. The introduction of deep learning in recent years has paved a new path for computer vision to be explored. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) can be trained to interpret images of a desired destination and accurately mark key features on its surface. In this paper, the application of CNNs to detect lunar craters for autonomous optical navigation is explored beyond previous implementations such as terrain-relative navigation (TRN), which are constrained to low lunar orbits ( < 100 km). More specifically, the state-of-the-art, real-time object detection algorithm YOLO (You Only Look Once) is trained with a comprehensive dataset of realistic, synthetically generated Moon images at a range of illumination conditions and distances (up to 71 , 250 km). A comprehensive analysis of line-of-sight and crater-area estimations is also performed as a function of relevant factors (e.g., distance, crater radii, solar-incidence angle, etc.) to inform on the usability of crater detections for autonomous navigation. We found that for a spacecraft orbiting the Moon, a CNN can robustly generalize the detection of surface craters for various illumination conditions and outside of its training range ( 2500 − 100 , 000 km ( ≈ 0 . 1 − 14 km/pixel ground sample distance (GSD))), with performance primarily influenced by crater size, distance to the surface, solar-phase angle, and spacecraft-emission angle. For the following factor ranges (evaluated independently), crater radius 32 − 64 px, distance 3250 − 45 , 000 km, solar-phase angles 30 ° − 135 ° , and spacecraft-emission angles < 60 ° , the model achieved mean crater area error 4 . 9 % − 5 . 8 % , mean normalized angular error 0 . 03 % − 0 . 07 % , and mean confidence 87 % − 91 % . Findings demonstrate the potential of CNNs applied to cislunar OpNav in orbit and provide a comprehensive characterization of measurement accuracies that could be further leveraged for feasibility analyses of autonomous missions. • Demonstrated a crater detection model that could detect craters up to 100 , 000 km. • Quantified how certain factors (radius, distance, etc.) drive detection accuracy. • Defined an OpNav Usability Envelope for crater detection up to 71 , 250 km. • Offered guidance for crater selection and imaging geometries for future missions.

Acta AstronauticaVol. 240
San Diego State University (US), University of California San Diego (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Planetary Science and Exploration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.