Real-world utilization patterns of bone-modifying agents for multiple myeloma in the era of novel therapies

Abstract Background Little is known about the utilization patterns of bone modifying agents (BMA) among patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) in the era of triplet and quadruplet regimens. Methods This retrospective cohort study used electronic health records from a large, integrated health system in Ohio and Florida to identify adults with NDMM between January 1, 2017-December 31, 2023 who received triplet or quadruplet regimen within a year of diagnosis. Main outcomes were receipt of BMA within +/- 90 days of systemic treatment initiation and type of initial BMA received. Results A total of 706 patients were identified. Mean [SD] age at diagnosis was 66.3 [10.1] years; 321 [45.5%] were female; 593 received triplet and 113 quadruplet regimen. In terms of race and ethnicity, 165 patients [23.4%] were Black, 515 [72.9%] were White, and 39 [5.5%] had Hispanic ethnicity. The majority of patients (497 [70.4%]) had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1, and 399 [56.5%] had estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2. During the study period, 502 patients (71.1%) received BMA and 372 (52.7%) received it within +/- 90 days of systemic therapy initiation. Among those diagnosed between 2018 and 2023 and with BMA during the study period (n=422), the initial BMA was a bisphosphonate for 339 (80.3%) and denosumab for 83 (19.7%). The median patient who had 1- or 2-year follow-up since initiation of systemic therapy and also received BMA during that time (n=494 for year 1 and n=315 for year 2), had BMA administered 6 times in the first year (IQR, 3.0-9.0) and 5 times in the second year (IQR, 3.0-8.0). In the multivariable models, baseline eGFR <60 (vs. ≥60) was negatively associated with BMA receipt within +/- 90 days (AOR, 0.56, 95% CI, 0.40-0.77), while micropolitan area (vs. metropolitan, AOR, 2.41, 95% CI, 1.28-4.75) and Ohio regional hospitals (vs. Taussig cancer center, AOR, 1.65, 95% CI, 1.08-2.53) were positively associated. Sex, age at diagnosis, race, ethnicity, year of diagnosis, Area Deprivation Index quartile, insurance type, Charlson comorbidity index, and ECOG performance status were not associated with BMA receipt within +/- 90 days of systemic therapy Patients with a baseline eGFR <60 (vs. ≥60) had higher odds of receiving denosumab (vs. bisphosphonates, AOR, 3.48, 95% CI, 2.03-6.06). Other variables were not significant predictors in the model. Conclusion Delays and underuse of BMAs in patients with NDMM have not markedly improved in the era of novel therapies. Future studies should examine the barriers to the timely initiation of BMAs.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-4402
Primary Topic
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world utilization patterns of bone-modifying agents for multiple myeloma in the era of novel therapies

Blood
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
article

Real-world utilization patterns of bone-modifying agents for multiple myeloma in the era of novel therapies

article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Little is known about the utilization patterns of bone modifying agents (BMA) among patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) in the era of triplet and quadruplet regimens. Methods This retrospective cohort study used electronic health records from a large, integrated health system in Ohio and Florida to identify adults with NDMM between January 1, 2017-December 31, 2023 who received triplet or quadruplet regimen within a year of diagnosis. Main outcomes were receipt of BMA within +/- 90 days of systemic treatment initiation and type of initial BMA received. Results A total of 706 patients were identified. Mean [SD] age at diagnosis was 66.3 [10.1] years; 321 [45.5%] were female; 593 received triplet and 113 quadruplet regimen. In terms of race and ethnicity, 165 patients [23.4%] were Black, 515 [72.9%] were White, and 39 [5.5%] had Hispanic ethnicity. The majority of patients (497 [70.4%]) had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1, and 399 [56.5%] had estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2. During the study period, 502 patients (71.1%) received BMA and 372 (52.7%) received it within +/- 90 days of systemic therapy initiation. Among those diagnosed between 2018 and 2023 and with BMA during the study period (n=422), the initial BMA was a bisphosphonate for 339 (80.3%) and denosumab for 83 (19.7%). The median patient who had 1- or 2-year follow-up since initiation of systemic therapy and also received BMA during that time (n=494 for year 1 and n=315 for year 2), had BMA administered 6 times in the first year (IQR, 3.0-9.0) and 5 times in the second year (IQR, 3.0-8.0). In the multivariable models, baseline eGFR <60 (vs. ≥60) was negatively associated with BMA receipt within +/- 90 days (AOR, 0.56, 95% CI, 0.40-0.77), while micropolitan area (vs. metropolitan, AOR, 2.41, 95% CI, 1.28-4.75) and Ohio regional hospitals (vs. Taussig cancer center, AOR, 1.65, 95% CI, 1.08-2.53) were positively associated. Sex, age at diagnosis, race, ethnicity, year of diagnosis, Area Deprivation Index quartile, insurance type, Charlson comorbidity index, and ECOG performance status were not associated with BMA receipt within +/- 90 days of systemic therapy Patients with a baseline eGFR <60 (vs. ≥60) had higher odds of receiving denosumab (vs. bisphosphonates, AOR, 3.48, 95% CI, 2.03-6.06). Other variables were not significant predictors in the model. Conclusion Delays and underuse of BMAs in patients with NDMM have not markedly improved in the era of novel therapies. Future studies should examine the barriers to the timely initiation of BMAs.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
Cleveland Clinic (US), Case Western Reserve University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.