Work Less, Live More? The Impact of an Introduction of the Four-Day Working Week on Happiness in the Context of the Icelandic Four-Day Working Week Experiment

In our current age, the quest for a better work-life balance is becoming paramount to increasing numbers of people. The concept of the Four-Day Working Week (FDWW) therefore emerges as a potential solution, promising to revolutionise our traditional understanding of worktime and well-being. By focusing on the world’s largest FDWW trial at the time, Iceland’s FDWW experiment from 2015 to 2019, and using data from the European Social Survey, the FDWW’s impact on happiness is critically examined. Ordinary Least Squares regressions are employed to analyse the association of working hours with happiness amongst Icelandic workers and to conduct an evidence-based policy evaluation. Contrary to widespread expectations and existing media narratives, the findings reveal no significant impact of working hours on employees’ happiness scores. This outcome challenges the conventional wisdom that less work leads directly to more happiness. The findings thereby contribute significantly to debates on the future of work, suggesting that the FDWW should be viewed with caution until more conclusive evidence is available. This absence of definitive proof calls into question the notion of the FDWW as a universally effective solution to the economic and social challenges faced by contemporary society. Keywords: employee well-being; four-day working week; future of work; workplace happiness; work time reduction

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Econstor (Econstor)
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5282/jums/v10i4pp831-857
Primary Topic
Work-Family Balance Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Work Less, Live More? The Impact of an Introduction of the Four-Day Working Week on Happiness in the Context of the Icelandic Four-Day Working Week Experiment

Econstor (Econstor)
Work-Family Balance Challenges
article

Work Less, Live More? The Impact of an Introduction of the Four-Day Working Week on Happiness in the Context of the Icelandic Four-Day Working Week Experiment

article en

Abstract

In our current age, the quest for a better work-life balance is becoming paramount to increasing numbers of people. The concept of the Four-Day Working Week (FDWW) therefore emerges as a potential solution, promising to revolutionise our traditional understanding of worktime and well-being. By focusing on the world’s largest FDWW trial at the time, Iceland’s FDWW experiment from 2015 to 2019, and using data from the European Social Survey, the FDWW’s impact on happiness is critically examined. Ordinary Least Squares regressions are employed to analyse the association of working hours with happiness amongst Icelandic workers and to conduct an evidence-based policy evaluation. Contrary to widespread expectations and existing media narratives, the findings reveal no significant impact of working hours on employees’ happiness scores. This outcome challenges the conventional wisdom that less work leads directly to more happiness. The findings thereby contribute significantly to debates on the future of work, suggesting that the FDWW should be viewed with caution until more conclusive evidence is available. This absence of definitive proof calls into question the notion of the FDWW as a universally effective solution to the economic and social challenges faced by contemporary society. Keywords: employee well-being; four-day working week; future of work; workplace happiness; work time reduction

Econstor (Econstor)
University of St Andrews (GB)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Work-Family Balance Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.