Outcomes and evolution of fenestrated-branched EVAR: a 10-year single-centre learning curve analysis

INTRODUCTION: Fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair (f/bEVAR) represents an advanced technique for treating aortic aneurysms that extend to or involve visceral and renal vessels. This technically demanding procedure requires specialised skills and has a steep learning curve. This study aimed to analyse a single-centre 10-year experience with F/BEVAR, focusing on the learning curve effect. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on all f/bEVAR cases performed between 2016 and the present day. Patients without follow-up were excluded. Cases were stratified by study period quartile to account for unequal case distribution over the years. Primary outcomes included technical success (defined as successful incorporation of target vessels), 30-day mortality, major adverse events (MAE), and one-year reintervention rates. Procedural characteristics and outcomes were compared across quartiles. RESULTS: A total of 53 cases were included, with a median age of 71 years, and 49 (92.5%) of the patients were male. Six (11.3%) were symptomatic aneurysms, and one patient presented with a ruptured aneurysm. Twenty-one (39.6%) cases had thoracoabdominal aneurysms, followed by juxta-renal (19 cases, 35.8%). Five patients (9.4%) had a history of aortic dissection. Six patients (11.3%) underwent arch procedures. Most cases (44 cases, 83%) had 4 target vessels incorporated. Thirty-day mortality was 11.3%, and 30-day MAE was 13.2%. When analysing by temporal quartile, the 4th study quartile demonstrated higher proportions of arch procedures, higher numbers of vessels incorporated, increased use of femoral-only access, higher implementation of fusion imaging, and lower 30-day mortality and MAE rates. A proctor was present in 34% of cases, primarily in the first 2 study quartiles. CONCLUSION: This 10-year experience with f/bEVAR demonstrates a significant learning curve effect. These findings highlight the importance of specialised training, proctorship in early experience, and the value of cumulative institutional expertise in managing complex aortic pathologies with f/bEVAR.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48750/acv.677
Primary Topic
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outcomes and evolution of fenestrated-branched EVAR: a 10-year single-centre learning curve analysis

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
article

Outcomes and evolution of fenestrated-branched EVAR: a 10-year single-centre learning curve analysis

article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair (f/bEVAR) represents an advanced technique for treating aortic aneurysms that extend to or involve visceral and renal vessels. This technically demanding procedure requires specialised skills and has a steep learning curve. This study aimed to analyse a single-centre 10-year experience with F/BEVAR, focusing on the learning curve effect. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on all f/bEVAR cases performed between 2016 and the present day. Patients without follow-up were excluded. Cases were stratified by study period quartile to account for unequal case distribution over the years. Primary outcomes included technical success (defined as successful incorporation of target vessels), 30-day mortality, major adverse events (MAE), and one-year reintervention rates. Procedural characteristics and outcomes were compared across quartiles. RESULTS: A total of 53 cases were included, with a median age of 71 years, and 49 (92.5%) of the patients were male. Six (11.3%) were symptomatic aneurysms, and one patient presented with a ruptured aneurysm. Twenty-one (39.6%) cases had thoracoabdominal aneurysms, followed by juxta-renal (19 cases, 35.8%). Five patients (9.4%) had a history of aortic dissection. Six patients (11.3%) underwent arch procedures. Most cases (44 cases, 83%) had 4 target vessels incorporated. Thirty-day mortality was 11.3%, and 30-day MAE was 13.2%. When analysing by temporal quartile, the 4th study quartile demonstrated higher proportions of arch procedures, higher numbers of vessels incorporated, increased use of femoral-only access, higher implementation of fusion imaging, and lower 30-day mortality and MAE rates. A proctor was present in 34% of cases, primarily in the first 2 study quartiles. CONCLUSION: This 10-year experience with f/bEVAR demonstrates a significant learning curve effect. These findings highlight the importance of specialised training, proctorship in early experience, and the value of cumulative institutional expertise in managing complex aortic pathologies with f/bEVAR.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Universidade do Porto (PT), Hospital de São João (PT), Administração Regional de Saúde de Lisboa e Vale do Tejo (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.