Mapping Recurrent Lexico-grammatical Patterns in English Through Subtree Fragments

Abstract This paper examines subtree fragments (StF) as a corpus-informed method for identifying recurrent lexico-grammatical structures and compares them to two established approaches: collocational frameworks (Sinclair and Renouf 1988) and pattern grammar (Hunston and Francis 2000). StFs differ from these approaches in two major respects. First, they are grounded in a theoretical linguistic assumption that lexical heads project syntactic structures, incorporating part-of-speech categories, phrase structures, and thematic role assignment. Second, StFs are identified semi-automatically from parsed corpora by exploring patterns of grammatical words and syntactic categories, in contrast to the predominantly manual, concordance-based methods of the other two approaches. The findings suggest that StFs provide a productive interface between theory-driven syntactic analysis and data-driven corpus linguistics, allowing for fine-grained mapping between form, meaning, and use while retaining compatibility with probabilistic and statistical perspectives.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Linguistics/Jazykovedný casopis
Published
2025-06-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/jazcas-2025-0009
Primary Topic
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping Recurrent Lexico-grammatical Patterns in English Through Subtree Fragments

Journal of Linguistics/Jazykovedný casopis
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
article

Mapping Recurrent Lexico-grammatical Patterns in English Through Subtree Fragments

article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines subtree fragments (StF) as a corpus-informed method for identifying recurrent lexico-grammatical structures and compares them to two established approaches: collocational frameworks (Sinclair and Renouf 1988) and pattern grammar (Hunston and Francis 2000). StFs differ from these approaches in two major respects. First, they are grounded in a theoretical linguistic assumption that lexical heads project syntactic structures, incorporating part-of-speech categories, phrase structures, and thematic role assignment. Second, StFs are identified semi-automatically from parsed corpora by exploring patterns of grammatical words and syntactic categories, in contrast to the predominantly manual, concordance-based methods of the other two approaches. The findings suggest that StFs provide a productive interface between theory-driven syntactic analysis and data-driven corpus linguistics, allowing for fine-grained mapping between form, meaning, and use while retaining compatibility with probabilistic and statistical perspectives.

Journal of Linguistics/Jazykovedný casopisVol. 76(1)
Universität Innsbruck (AT)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.