Unleashing the potential of artificial intelligence to enhance reverse logistics operations

Purpose This study investigates how supply chain managers perceive the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) types on reverse logistics (RL) processes-network design, collection, warehousing and processing–and to identify the conditions under which these AI types are perceived to succeed or fall short. Design/methodology/approach A quantitative survey approach was adopted, with data collected from individual supply chain managers representing international manufacturing companies. A total of 228 valid responses were analysed using covariance-based structural equation modelling (CB-SEM). Findings The results highlight the perceived dominant role of Analytical AI, which managers reported as significantly enhancing all four RL processes–network design, collection, warehousing and processing. In contrast, Intuitive AI was perceived to influence only the warehousing stage, while Mechanical AI was not viewed as exerting a statistically significant effect on any RL process. These findings reflect managers' perceptions of how distinct AI types shape efficiency, responsiveness and adaptability in RL practices. Practical implications The study offers insights for practitioners by showing how managers interpret and experience the influence of AI tools across RL processes. Firms can use these perceptual insights to guide the strategic alignment between AI adoption and managers' operational priorities, thereby enhancing RL decision-making, agility, and resource use. Originality/value The originality of this study lies in its analysis of how managers differentiate among mechanical, analytical, and intuitive AI in RL contexts. While prior research has explored AI's general role in supply chain management, this study advances understanding by capturing managerial perceptions of the distinct contributions and limitations of different AI types across specific RL processes.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpdlm-06-2025-0296
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unleashing the potential of artificial intelligence to enhance reverse logistics operations

1 citations
International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
2.23
article

Unleashing the potential of artificial intelligence to enhance reverse logistics operations

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study investigates how supply chain managers perceive the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) types on reverse logistics (RL) processes-network design, collection, warehousing and processing–and to identify the conditions under which these AI types are perceived to succeed or fall short. Design/methodology/approach A quantitative survey approach was adopted, with data collected from individual supply chain managers representing international manufacturing companies. A total of 228 valid responses were analysed using covariance-based structural equation modelling (CB-SEM). Findings The results highlight the perceived dominant role of Analytical AI, which managers reported as significantly enhancing all four RL processes–network design, collection, warehousing and processing. In contrast, Intuitive AI was perceived to influence only the warehousing stage, while Mechanical AI was not viewed as exerting a statistically significant effect on any RL process. These findings reflect managers' perceptions of how distinct AI types shape efficiency, responsiveness and adaptability in RL practices. Practical implications The study offers insights for practitioners by showing how managers interpret and experience the influence of AI tools across RL processes. Firms can use these perceptual insights to guide the strategic alignment between AI adoption and managers' operational priorities, thereby enhancing RL decision-making, agility, and resource use. Originality/value The originality of this study lies in its analysis of how managers differentiate among mechanical, analytical, and intuitive AI in RL contexts. While prior research has explored AI's general role in supply chain management, this study advances understanding by capturing managerial perceptions of the distinct contributions and limitations of different AI types across specific RL processes.

International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics ManagementVol. 56(1)
University of Jordan (JO), King Abdulaziz University (SA), German Jordanian University (JO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Unleashing the potential of artificial intelligence to enhance reverse logistics operations · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS